ANALYSIS MODELS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS AND STATE DEBT INDICATORS

Keywords: public debt, econometric modeling, monetary policy, analysis, vector autoregression model, structural model

Abstract

The publication highlights the results of the conducted research aimed at the formation of models for the analysis of macroeconomic indicators, which determine the key parameters of the state's debt policy in their interrelationship and interdependence. The study of the existing basic models of debt policy formation proved the limited possibilities of their effective application in the process of public debt management in Ukraine in modern conditions. The analysis of statistical information, as well as the use of econometric analysis methods, allowed us to propose a possible approach to solving the problem of assessing the nature of the relationship between macroeconomic indicators and parameters of the state's debt and monetary policy. The construction of a simulative model based on the formed information base, reflecting the main relationships between endogenous and exogenous variables that determine the prerequisites for the formation of the components of the state debt, as well as describing the patterns of changes in the values of macroeconomic indicators, made it possible to track the direction and nature of the cause-and-effect relationships between endogenous and exogenous variables in the context of analysis and forecasting of indicators of internal and external public debt and forecasting of debt policy parameters. A vector autoregressive model was developed to supplement the results obtained using the simulative model. The analysis of macroeconomic indicators proved that the application of the classical vector autoregressive model gives slightly better results than the application of the structural econometric model in the context of solving the problem of developing a toolkit for analysis and modeling of factors that determine the patterns and trends of the formation of the national debt of Ukraine. On the basis of the developed and researched models, it can be stated that the change in the size of the internal state debt is determined by the influence of monetary policy parameters, as well as the external debt, the amount of gold and foreign exchange reserves, the average annual reported yield of the OVDP, the balance of payments and the deficit of the consolidated budget. The conducted econometric analysis of the formed models showed the presence of statistically significant parameter estimates for variables that correspond to monetary indicators in each of the equations, which confirms the existence of a significant influence of monetary policy on the formation of domestic debt.

References

Togo, E. Coordinating public debt management withfiscal and monetary policies: Ananalytical framework (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4369), 2007.

Cavalcanti, M. A. F. H., Vereda, L., de Doctors, R. B., & Lima, F. C. The macroeconomiceffects of monetary policy shocks underfiscal rules constrained by public debt sustainability. Economic Modelling. 2018. №71. P. 184–201.

Canzoneri, M., Cumby, E., & Diba, B. Optimal money and debt management: Liquidity provision vs tax smoothing. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2016. № 83. P. 39−53.

Barro, R. J. (1995).Optimal debt management (NBER Working Paper 5327), 1995.

Martin Hodula and Aleš Melecký Debt management when monetary andfiscal policies clash:some empirical evidence. Journal of applied economics. 2020. Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 253–280.

Пілько А.Д. Перспективні напрями системного аналізу та моделювання процесів управління державним боргом. Проблеми економіки. 2015. № 3. С. 317–321.

Вінокуров Я. Державний борг України перевищить 100 % ВВП. Що це означає? URL: https://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2022/10/25/692991/ (дата звернення: 23.12.2022)

Guidelines for Public Debt Management. Prepared by the Staffs of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/pdebt/2000/eng/index.htm?fbclid=IwAR0EXHidnxBnvksqYxPkkdihGx1P3H1TuuZL7l-3ojWfQPPsurXJntiMQN4 (дата звернення: 22.12.2022)

Макар О.П. Світовий досвід управління державним боргом і перспективи його застосування в Україні. Економіка та держава. 2012. № 10. С. 54–57.

Меренкова Л.О. Оцінка державного боргу та боргової політики у контексті забезпечення боргової безпеки України. Глобальні та національні проблеми економіки. Випуск 22. 2018. С. 823–828. URL: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/22-2018/155.pdf

Офіційний сайт Національного антикорупційного бюро України. URL: https://nabu.ua (дата звернення: 01.12.2022)

Офіційний сайт Національного банку України. URL: www.bank.gov.ua (дата звернення: 01.12.2022).

Пілько А.Д, Крамар В.Р. Аналіз та прогнозування параметрів монетарної політики на основі системи одночасних структурних рівнянь. Бізнес Інформ. 2020. № 1. С. 163–169.

Системний аналіз формування державної політики в умовах макроекономічної дестабілізації [І.Г. Лук’яненко, Д. Віт, O.K. Прімєрова та інші]; І.Г. Лук’яненко; Києво-Могилянська академія. Київ : [НаУКМА], 2017. 463 с.

Прімєрова О.К., Осадча К.І. Оцінювання боргового навантаження та платоспроможності України на сучасному етапі. Ефективна економіка. 2020. № 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.10.54

Togo, E. (2007).Coordinating public debt management withfiscal and monetary policies: Ananalytical framework(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4369).

Cavalcanti, M. A. F. H., Vereda, L., de Doctors, R. B., & Lima, F. C. (2018). The macroeconomiceffects of monetary policy shocks underfiscal rules constrained by public debt sustainability. Economic Modelling, vol. 71, pp. 184–201.

Canzoneri, M., Cumby, E., & Diba, B. (2016). Optimal money and debt management: Liquidity provision vs tax smoothing. Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 83, pp. 39−53.

Barro, R. J. (1995).Optimal debt management (NBER Working Paper 5327).

Martin Hodula and Aleš Melecký (2020) Debt management when monetary and fiscal policies clash: some empirical evidence. Journal of applied economics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 253–280.

Pilko A.D. (2015) Perspektyvni napriamy systemnoho analizu ta modeliuvannia protsesiv upravlinnia derzhavnym borhom. [Prospective areas of system analysis and modeling of public debt management processes] Problemy ekonomiky, vol. 3, pp. 317–321. (in Ukrainian)

Vinokurov Ya. Derzhavnyi borh Ukrainy perevyshchyt 100 % VVP. Shcho tse oznachaie? [The national debt of Ukraine will exceed 100% of GDP. What does it mean?]. Available at: https://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2022/10/25/692991/ (in Ukrainian)

Guidelines for Public Debt Management. Prepared by the Staffs of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/pdebt/2000/eng/index.htm?fbclid=IwAR0EXHidnxBnvksqYxPkkdihGx1P3H1TuuZL7l-3ojWfQPPsurXJntiMQN4

Makar O.P. (2012) Svitovyi dosvid upravlinnia derzhavnym borhom i perspektyvy yoho zastosuvannia v Ukraini [Global experience of public debt management and prospects for its application in Ukraine]. Economy and the state, no. 10, pp. 54–57. Available at:http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecde_2012_10_15 (in Ukrainian)

Merenkova L.O. (2018) Otsinka derzhavnoho borhu ta borhovoi polityky u konteksti zabezpechennia borhovoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Assessment of public debt and debt policy in the context of ensuring Ukraine's debt security]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, no. 22, pp. 823–828. Available at: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/22-2018/155.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Ofitsiinyi sait Natsionalnoho antykoruptsiinoho biuro Ukrainy [Official website of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine] Available at: https://nabu.ua

Ofitsiinyi sait Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy [Official website of the National Bank of Ukraine]. Available at: www.bank.gov.ua

Pilko A.D., Kramar V.R. (2020) Analiz ta prohnozuvannia parametriv monetarnoi polityky na osnovi systemy odnochasnykh strukturnykh rivnian. [Analysis and forecasting of monetary policy parameters based on the system of simultaneous structural equations]. Business Inform, no 1, pp. 163–169. (in Ukrainian)

Lukianenko I.H., Vit D., Primierova O.K. (2017) Systemnyi analiz formuvannia derzhavnoi polityky v umovakh makroekonomichnoi destabilizatsii [Systematic analysis of state policy formation in conditions of macroeconomic destabilization]. 463 p. (in Ukrainian)

Primierova O.K., Osadcha K.I. (2020) Otsiniuvannia borhovoho navantazhennia ta platospromozhnosti Ukrainy na suchasnomu etapi [Assessment of the debt burden and solvency of Ukraine at the current stage]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.10.54 (in Ukrainian)

Article views: 377
PDF Downloads: 163
Published
2022-11-29
How to Cite
Pilko, A., & Chepyha, B. (2022). ANALYSIS MODELS OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS AND STATE DEBT INDICATORS. Economy and Society, (45). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-60
Section
ECONOMICS