MARKETING OF INTANGIBLE AND TANGIBLE: THE DIFFERENCE AND SPECIFICITY

Keywords: marketing, marketing of the service sphere, marketing of services, marketing of industries and spheres, marketing mix of the service sphere, interactive marketing, functional-instrumental model of service quality

Abstract

The article examines the difference between marketing of services and marketing of material production. It is also proposed to divide marketing by application into four types: B2B service sphere marketing, B2C service sphere marketing, B2B material production marketing and B2C material production marketing. The difference between the marketing of the material sphere and the marketing of the service sphere in terms of such categories as marketing, marketing mix, quality, materiality and tangibility, time of production and consumption is shown. For each category, the necessary actions of a marketer working in the service sector are listed. Emphasis is placed on the features of the service as a product, from which the specific features of service marketing emerge: intangibility, inseparability from the source, impermanence and non-preservability of the service. As a result of the specifics of services, there is a need to formulate a policy not only of external and internal marketing, but also of interactive marketing, i.e. marketing of client/staff interaction in the service process. The intangibility and immateriality of the service strengthens the role of trust in the manufacturer and the importance of the "physical evidence" element in the system of the marketing mix of the service sector, and the advertiser and the site developer face the task of maximally visualizing the service. Service continuity requires marketers to be able to manage demand quickly, not only during the year or month, but also days of the week or hours of the day, as well as the art of adapting to demand during peak hours. The variability of service quality requires clear service standards combined with motivation and training. It is accepted to distinguish separately the quality of the service process and the quality of the result from the purchase of the service. This model was called the functional-instrumental model of service quality, and it does not lose its relevance these days. Modern technologies make it possible to reduce the effect of the human factor and significantly eliminate the negative manifestations of service features. Automation, involving the client in self-service are effective tools for reducing the variability of service quality. Such methods are widely used in retail, banking, partly in education and medicine, and in many other areas and industries. In addition to the division of marketing into the service sphere and the sphere of material production, the article proposes the division of industries and spheres into three consolidated groups: emotional direction, rational direction, and mixed direction. The essence of the elements of the marketing mix and their importance may vary depending on the specific group. Similarly, the ratio of the importance of functional and instrumental quality of the service will depend on the emotional or rational direction of the service.

References

Буднікевич І.М. Маркетинг у галузях і сферах діяльності : Навч. посіб. / За ред. Буднікевич І.М. Київ : «Центр навчальної літератури», 2019. 536 с.

Данилюк Т. Маркетинг у сфері послуг. Економічний часопис Волинського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. 2021. № 2. С. 128–136.

Державна служба статистики України. URL: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/ (дата звернення: 15.07.2022).

Іванова Л.О., Семак Б.Б., Вовчанська О.М. Маркетинг послуг : Навч. посіб. Львів : Видавництво Львівського торговельно-економічного університету, 2018. 508 с.

Booms B., Bitner M. J. Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms. Marketing of Services, James H. Donnelly and William R. George, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 47-51. URL: http://www.toolshero.com/marketing/service-marketing-mix-7ps/ (accessed 17 July 2022).

Grönroos C. Adopting a Service Logic for Marketing. Marketing Theory. 2006. № 6 (3). Р. 317–333.

Langeard E., Eiglier Р. Servuction: le marketing des services, Ediscience International, 1987. 205 р.

Lovelock C.H., Patterson P., Wirtz J. Services Marketing. 6th edition. Copyright © Pearson Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd). 2015. 94 p.

Rathmell J. Marketing in the Service Sector. Mass: Winthrop Publishers, 1974. 232 р.

Budnikevych I.M. (2019) Marketynh u haluziakh i sferakh diialnosti [Marketing in industries and spheres of activity]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury, 536. (in Ukrainian)

Danyliuk T. (2021) Marketynh u sferi posluh [Marketing in the field of services]. Marketing in the field of services. Ekonomichnyi chasopys Volynskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, 2, 128–136. (in Ukrainian)

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/ (in Ukrainian)

Ivanova L.O., Semak B.B., Vovchanska O.M. (2018) Marketynh posluh [Marketing services]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu, 508. (in Ukrainian)

Booms B., Bitner M.J. Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms. Marketing of Services, James H. Donnelly and William R. George, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 47–51. Retrieved from: http://www.toolshero.com/marketing/service-marketing-mix-7ps/

Grönroos C. (2006) Adopting a Service Logic for Marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 317–333.

Langeard E., Eiglier Р. (1987) Servuction: le marketing des services. Ediscience International, 205.

Lovelock C.H., Patterson P., Wirtz J. (2015) Services Marketing. Pearson Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd), 94.

Rathmell J. (1974) Marketing in the Service Sector. Mass: Winthrop Publishers, 232.

Article views: 201
PDF Downloads: 170
Published
2022-07-26
How to Cite
Tkachuk, S., & Stakhurskyi, V. (2022). MARKETING OF INTANGIBLE AND TANGIBLE: THE DIFFERENCE AND SPECIFICITY. Economy and Society, (41). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-41-18
Section
MARKETING