THE EVOLUTION OF UNDERWRITING IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE: A METHODOLOGY FOR ADAPTING AN INSURANCE COMPANY’S PRICING POLICY

Keywords: underwriting, climate change, insurance risks, tariff policy, catastrophe modeling, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), actuarial calculations

Abstract

The article examines the transformation of approaches to underwriting under conditions of increasing climate risks. It is demonstrated that the evolution of underwriting in the context of climate change has a systemic nature. The direction of the transformation of approaches to risk assessment under climate change has been identified – from retrospective statistical extrapolation to a scenario-oriented, geospatially detailed, and stochastically adaptive approach. It is proven that traditional actuarial methods based solely on historical data show limited predictive power in an environment of nonlinear climate trends, increasing frequency of extreme events, and strengthening correlations between risks. The necessity of modernizing insurers’ tariff policies considering the growing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is justified, particularly through integrating catastrophe modeling and scenario-stress analysis based on climate trajectories. A model for adapting the tariff policy of insurance companies is proposed, based on the integration of climate scenarios, regional risk differentiation, and dynamic pricing. The developed economic-mathematical model of the optimal tariff formalizes the dependence of claim frequency on the climate index, accounts for the extreme nature of loss distributions, and integrates solvency requirements through a VaR constraint. The developed hybrid tariff-setting model ensures a combination of actuarial soundness, strategic flexibility, and market competitiveness. The theoretical significance lies in advancing the concept of climate-oriented underwriting as a component of the financial risk-management system. The methodological novelty consists in combining stochastic modeling, scenario analysis, Solvency II principles, and behavioral demand parameters within a single optimization framework. The practical significance is defined as the potential for adapting the proposed model to tariff setting by Ukrainian insurers in the process of integration into the European regulatory space and during post-war reconstruction.

References

Swiss Re Climate Risk Services. URL: https://corporatesolutions.swissre.com/insurance-services/climate-risk-services.html (дата звернення 01.03.2026)

Swiss Re Sustainability Compass. URL: https://corporatesolutions.swissre.com/insurance-services/risk-data-and-services/sustainability-compass-climate-risk-solution.html (дата звернення 01.03.2026)

Natural catastrophes in 2023: gearing up for today’s and tomorrow’s weather risks. Zurich: Swiss Re Institute, 2024. 48 p.

Munich Re Climate Change Edition. URL: https://www.munichre.com/rmp/en/products/location-risk-intelligence/climate-change-edition.html (дата звернення 01.03.2026)

Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023. 184 p.

Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels. Paris: Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), 2022. 62 p.

Cummins J. D., Mahul O. Catastrophe Risk Financing in Developing Countries: Principles for Public Intervention. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009. 256 p.

Bolton P., Després M., Pereira da Silva L., Samama F., Svartzman R. The green swan: Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2020. 114 p.

Battiston S., Mandel A., Monasterolo I., Schütze F., Visentin G. A climate stress-test of the financial system // Nature Climate Change. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 283–288.

Kousky C. Informing climate adaptation: A review of the economic costs of natural disasters // Energy Economics. 2014. Vol. 46. P. 576–592.

Mills E. Insurance in a climate of change // Science. 2005. Vol. 309, Issue 5737. P. 1040–1044.

Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Insurance Industry. Geneva: The Geneva Association, 2021. 95 p.

Climate-related risk and financial stability. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2021. 120 p.

Global Catastrophe Modelling Framework. Newark: Risk Management Solutions, 2020. 67 p.

Catastrophe Modeling and Climate Change: Managing the Uncertainty. Boston: AIR Worldwide, 2021. 54 p.

Eccles R. G., Krzus M. P. The Nordic Model: An Analysis of Leading Practices in ESG Disclosure. Boston: Harvard Business School, 2018. 52 p.

Brandon R., Krueger P., Schmidt P. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Working Paper. 2021. 57 p. URL: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/gibsonkruegerschmidtfinal_1.pdf (дата звернення 02.03.2026)

Berg F., Kölbel J., Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. 2019. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438533 (дата звернення 02.03.2026)

Національний банк України. Огляд небанківського фінансового сектору. Київ: НБУ, 2023. 78 с.

Swiss Re. Climate Risk Services. Available at: https://corporatesolutions.swissre.com/insurance-services/climate-risk-services.html (accessed 01 March 2026).

Swiss Re. Sustainability Compass. Available at: https://corporatesolutions.swissre.com/insurance-services/risk-data-and-services/sustainability-compass-climate-risk-solution.html (accessed 01 March 2026).

Swiss Re Institute. (2014). Natural Catastrophes in 2023: Gearing Up for Today’s and Tomorrow’s Weather Risks. Zurich: Swiss Re Institute, p. 48 .

Munich Re. Climate Change Edition. Available at: https://www.munichre.com/rmp/en/products/location-risk-intelligence/climate-change-edition.html (accessed 01 March 2026).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023). Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC, 2023, p. 184.

Network for Greening the Financial System (2022). Climate-Related Risk Drivers and Their Transmission Channels. Paris: NGFS,p. 62.

Cummins J. D., Mahul O. (2009). Catastrophe Risk Financing in Developing Countries: Principles for Public Intervention. Washington, DC: World Bank, p. 256.

Bolton P., Després M., Pereira da Silva L., Samama F., Svartzman R. (2020). The Green Swan: Central Banking and Financial Stability in the Age of Climate Change. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, p. 114.

Battiston S., Mandel A., Monasterolo I., Schütze F., Visentin G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change. Vol. 7, pp. 283–288.

Kousky C. (2014). Informing climate adaptation: A review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Economics. Vol. 46, pp. 576–592.

Mills E. (2005). Insurance in a climate of change. Science. Vol. 309, Issue 5737, pp. 1040–1044.

The Geneva Association. (2021).. Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Insurance Industry. Geneva: The Geneva Association, p 95.

European Central Bank. (2021). Climate-Related Risk and Financial Stability. Frankfurt am Main: ECB, p. 120

Risk Management Solutions. (2020). Global Catastrophe Modelling Framework. Newark: RMS, p. 67

AIR Worldwide. (2021). Catastrophe Modeling and Climate Change: Managing the Uncertainty. Boston: AIR Worldwide, 2021. 54 p.

Eccles R. G., Krzus M. P. (2018). The Nordic Model: An Analysis of Leading Practices in ESG Disclosure. Boston: Harvard Business School, p. 52

Brandon R., Krueger P., Schmidt P. (2021). ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Working Paper. p. 57. Available at: https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/gibsonkruegerschmidtfinal_1.pdf (accessed 02 March 2026).

Berg F., Kölbel J., Rigobon R. (2019). Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438533 (accessed 01 March 2026).

Natsionalnyi bank Ukrainy. (2023) Ohliad nebankivskoho finansovoho sektoru [National Bank of Ukraine. Non-bank financial sector review.]. Kyiv: NBU, p. 78.

Article views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2026-03-26
How to Cite
Pikus, R., & Cherkasenko, V. (2026). THE EVOLUTION OF UNDERWRITING IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE: A METHODOLOGY FOR ADAPTING AN INSURANCE COMPANY’S PRICING POLICY. Economy and Society, (84). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-84-25