SCIENCE-BASED SYNTHESIS VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE CAUSES OF CONFLICTS AT INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

Abstract

Official statistics showing a quantitative increase in labor conflicts are analyzed and along the way a constant reduction in the number of fixed labor conflicts is monitored. The opinion of the English scientist Anthony Giddens, who argues that there is no direct connection between the existing level of economic success of enterprises and the existing number of strikes, is taken into account. The problem of the existence of mobbing (bullying) in the team is emphasized. Surveys made by HeadHunter by the international personnel portal in various companies have been processed, regarding the fact of the impact of mobbing on the growing number of industrial conflicts. The data of the official statistics published for the Ukrainian society on the number of recorded strikes at industrial enterprises were used, and it turned out to be small compared to their number in other democratic countries. The primary conditions of this fact are outlined such as: a complete lack of skills in organizing strikes in the state, a low level of access to official statistics, and the fear of losing one's job. The primary tasks of the current National Mediation and Conciliation Service are highlighted. Precise scientific research methods were used: when studying the opinions of scientists , organizing statistical data in order to summarize; system analysis is involved in working with practical statistics, causal is used in the characterization of the research. The result of his own research was the statement that the psychological climate in the team of employees of industrial enterprises and the area of definition of the psychological characteristics of each employee in society can be considered the most significant in conflict formation. This issue was clarified at industrial enterprises among managers and professional specialists of food industry enterprises of different levels of management by conducting a survey. It should be noted that statistics are now conducted differently in the world, because the international conceptual apparatus of the strike is not at all consistent even in regulatory documents.