CLUSTERING OF CEE COUNTRIES ACCORDING TO FEA INDICATORS

Keywords: foreign economic activity, foreign trade, clustering, cluster analysis, investments, Central and Eastern European countriеs

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of development of foreign trade activity of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the peculiarities of their socio-economic development, as well as the problems of transformation of economic systems. The aim of the study is to divide the countries of Central and Eastern Europe into groups according to foreign economic activity indicators for in-depth study of the degree of differentiation between these countries and development of recommendations for outsider countries. The relevance of the article is due to varying degrees and prerequisites development of foreign trade of Central and Eastern countries. The need to form clusters of CEE countries in terms of foreign economic activity is beyond doubt. Selecting the best cluster allows countries in the "worst" clusters to compare themselves with the leader, which, for example, will encourage the definition and achievement of foreign trade development goals by improving development strategies. The article also considers the issue of clustering of countries by indicators of foreign economic activity, such as the net trade index, export quota (indicator of economic openness), import quota, foreign direct investment as a percentage of gross domestic product; outflow of foreign direct investment as a percentage of gross domestic product; portfolio investments. The problems of differentiation between the countries of Central and Eastern Europe are also covered, the statistical analysis of the selected countries on indicators: import and export quotas are carried out, and also these data are visualized. As a result of the study using cluster analysis methods, the set of Central and Eastern European countries was divided into four clusters. The obtained data indicate a different level of economic situation in the foreign economic sphere. Only one country got into the best cluster - Hungary. Two more countries, Greece and Poland, are in the second most developed foreign trade cluster. The rest of the countries are divided between two more clusters, and Ukraine, unfortunately, is in the worst cluster together with Albania, Мoldova, Kosovo, Serbia and others.

References

Dziubanovska N. Multifactor models for studying the EU countries’ international trade. Економічний часопис-ХХІ. 2019. № 175(1-2). С. 29–34.

Gussenov B., Bastaubaev A. Model of development of foreign economic activity in the conditions of integration processes and globalization. N ews of the national Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of social and human sciences. 2019. № 5(327). С. 134–139.

Vahalík B., Staníčková M. Key factors of foreign trade competitiveness: Comparison of the EU and BRICS by factor and cluster analysis. Society and Economy. 2016. № 38(3). С. 295–317.

Staníčková M., Vahalík B., Fojtíková L. Globalization, International Trade and Competitiveness: What Links These Concepts? Challenge or Threat for Competitiveness of the World Economic Players–Especially EU, US and China?. European Integration. 2018. С. 1361.

Benešová I., Smutka L., Laputková A. Specifics of the Mutual Trade of the Post-Soviet Countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 2019. №7(1). С. 29–43.

Benešová I., Smutka L., Rumánková L., Laputková A., Novotná Z. Regional Cooperation of the Post Soviet Countries–Can it Be Influenced by the Structure of the Economy?. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2016. №64(6). С. 1843–1856.

Forte R., Santos N. A cluster analysis of FDI in Latin America. Latin american journal of economics. 2015. № 52(1). С. 25–56.

Silva V., Forte R. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Home Country Exports. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy. 2018. №9, С. 1850005.

Danaci T., Nacar R. Comparing the Foreign Trade and Logistic Performance of Turkey and EU Members with Cluster Analysis. PressAcademia Procedia. 2017. № 3(1). С. 31–36.

Dai T. Characteristics of International Trade Benefits Based on the Cluster Analysis of Compatibility Relation. International conference on Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical-Systems Springer, Singapore. 2019. С. 1060–1067.

Egger P. H., Tarlea F. Multi-way clustering estimation of standard errors in gravity models. Economics Letters. 2015. №134. С. 144–147.

Baltagi B. H., Egger P. H., Pfaffermayr, M. Panel data gravity models of international trade. CESifo Working Paper. 2014. №4616. 59 с.

Зовнішньоекономічна діяльність. Державна служба статистики України : веб-сайт. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (дата звернення: 24.10.2020).

Dziubanovska, N. (2019). Multifactor models for studying the EU countries’ international trade. Економічний часопис-ХХІ, 175(1-2), 29–34.

Gussenov, B., & Bastaubaev, A. (2019). Model of development of foreign economic activity in the conditions of integration processes and globalization. N ews of the national Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of social and human sciences, 5(327), 134–139.

Vahalík, B., & Staníčková, M. (2016). Key factors of foreign trade competitiveness: Comparison of the EU and BRICS by factor and cluster analysis. Society and Economy, 38(3), 295–317.

Staníčková, M., Vahalík, B., & Fojtíková, L. (2018). Globalization, International Trade and Competitiveness: What Links These Concepts? Challenge or Threat for Competitiveness of the World Economic Players–Especially EU, US and China? on European Integration 2018, 1361.

Benešová, I., Smutka, L., & Laputková, A. (2019). Specifics of the Mutual Trade of the Post-Soviet Countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 29–43.

Benešová, I., Smutka, L., Rumánková, L., Laputková, A., & Novotná, Z. (2016). Regional Cooperation of the Post Soviet Countries–Can it Be Influenced by the Structure of the Economy?. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 1843–1856.

Forte, R., & Santos, N. (2015). A cluster analysis of FDI in Latin America. Latin american journal of economics, 52(1), 25–56.

Silva, V., & Forte, R. (2018). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Home Country Exports. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 9(01n02), 1850005.

Danaci, T., & Nacar, R. (2017). Comparing the Foreign Trade and Logistic Performance of Turkey and EU Members with Cluster Analysis. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 31–36.

Dai, T. (2019, December). Characteristics of International Trade Benefits Based on the Cluster Analysis of Compatibility Relation. In International conference on Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical-Systems (pp. 1060-1067). Springer, Singapore.

Egger, P. H., & Tarlea, F. (2015). Multi-way clustering estimation of standard errors in gravity models. Economics Letters, 134, 144–147.

Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P. H., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2014). Panel data gravity models of international trade. CESifo Working Paper, №4616. 59.

State Statistic Service of Ukraine (2020). Foreign economic activity : website. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (accessed 24 October 2020).

Article views: 259
PDF Downloads: 278
Published
2021-04-27
How to Cite
Vdovyn, M., Zomchak, L., & Bodnar, O. (2021). CLUSTERING OF CEE COUNTRIES ACCORDING TO FEA INDICATORS. Economy and Society, (26). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-26-50
Section
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS