MODELING THE REVERSE IMPACT OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES ON THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF THE COUNTRY

Keywords: business structure architectonics, economic potential, reverse impact, differential equations, structural convergence, digitalization, self-reproduction, institutional framework, inclusive development

Abstract

The article scientifically substantiates a dynamic model of the reverse impact of business structure architectonics on a country’s economic potential during post-war recovery. Architectonics is interpreted as a complex institutional framework and adaptive morphology that ensures the endogenous-oriented development of business entities amidst high turbulence. The research proposes a system of interconnected differential equations describing the interdependence between the qualitative transformation of business units and macroeconomic indicators. The first equation formalizes the change in architectonics quality as a result of coordinated institutional pressure, the transformative power of digitalization, and the existing level of national economic potential. Special emphasis is placed on introducing a precisely defined target state, representing the ideal configuration required for successful structural convergence with the European Union economic space and global value chains. The second equation of the system models the growth of aggregate economic potential through the lens of a reverse feedback mechanism. The logic of its construction involves the endogenization of the growth limit, which ceases to be a static constant and becomes a function of business architectonics quality. It is proven that the speed of transformation of internal business configurations acts as an impulse driver for inclusive growth. This dynamic component functions as an "engine" translating micro-level efforts into the real expansion of national economic opportunities. The integrated model allows for simulating synergistic effects where macroeconomic growth stimulates business renewal, which, in turn, strengthens the state's potential through the reverse mechanism. The findings provide a theoretical basis for selecting optimal development trajectories to ensure the structural convergence and economic security of Ukraine within the Euro-integration process. Additionally, the model accounts for the impact of intelligent enterprises and digital ecosystems as catalysts for this transformative cycle.

References

Брятко, А. А. (2025). Передумови та цілі розвитку національної економіки україни в умовах глобальної геополітичної трансформації . Економічна парадигма, 1(7(99), 38–46. DOI:10.25313/2520-2294-2025-7-11189

Schiliro, D. (2026). Endogenous growth and structural economic dynamics: A comparative analysis. Economy, 13(1), 44-54. DOI: 10.20448/economy.v13i1.8427

Szeszák, B. M., Kerékjártó, I. G., Soltész, L., & Galambos, P. (2025). Industrial revolutions and automation: Tracing economic and social transformations of manufacturing. Societies, 15(4), 88. DOI: 10.3390/soc15040088

Комісаренко, А. О. (2022). Суспільство, держава, економіка: закономірності взаємодії. розвиток держави через соціальні механізми соціального простору. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія: Публічне управління та адміністрування, 53. DOI: 10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2022.1/10

Ivanov, R., Hurtovyi, Y., Maksyshko, N., Katan, V., & Osypchuk, M. (2025). Modelling the impact of state support types on agricultural production, considering exogenous shock and cyclical factors. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 11(3), 5–45. DOI: 10.51599/are.2025.11.03.01

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316678451

Gabaix, X. (2011). The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 79(3), 733-772. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA8769

Carvalho, V. M., & Grassi, B. (2019). Large firm dynamics and the business cycle. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1375-1425. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20151317

Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., Moussawi, R., & Sedunov, J. (2021). The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors. Management Science, 67(11), 6629–6659. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3808

Войтович, Л., & Федик, М. (2024). Стратегія повоєнного відновлення економіки україни в умовах євроінтеграції. Економіка та суспільство, (65). DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2024-65-112

Ishchuk, S., & Sozanskyy, L. (2025). Structural Transformation in EU Economies: a Possible Development Path for Ukraine. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 39(1), 77-93. DOI: 10.24917/20801653.391.5

Tutaj, J., Rutkowska, M., & Bartoszczuk, P. (2021). Enterprise business architecture as a tool for sustainable development in an enterprise-Case study. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 5050-5057. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.283

Boonstra, W.J. (2024). Malthusianism. In: Warf, B. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25900-5_235-1

Uzoamaka, N. O. P., Ifeoma, A. R., & Nosike, C. J. (2020). Strategic orientation dimensions: A critical review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 4(9), 609-612.

Sojecka, A. A., & Drozd-Rzoska, A. (2025). Verhulst-type equation and the universal pattern for global population growth. PLoS One, 20(5), e0323165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323165

Briatko, A. A. (2025). Peredumovy ta tsili rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky ukrainy v umovakh hlobalnoi heopolitychnoi transformatsii [Prerequisites and goals of the development of the national economy of Ukraine in the context of global geopolitical transformation]. Ekonomichna paradyhma – Economic paradigm, 1(7(99), 38–46. DOI: 10.25313/2520-2294-2025-7-11189. [in Ukrainian]

Schiliro, D. (2026). Endogenous growth and structural economic dynamics: A comparative analysis. Economy, 13(1), 44-54. DOI: 10.20448/economy.v13i1.8427

Szeszák, B. M., Kerékjártó, I. G., Soltész, L., & Galambos, P. (2025). Industrial revolutions and automation: Tracing economic and social transformations of manufacturing. Societies, 15(4), 88. DOI: 10.3390/soc15040088

Komisarenko, A. O. (2022). Suspilstvo, derzhava, ekonomika: zakonomirnosti vzaiemodii. rozvytok derzhavy cherez sotsialni mekhanizmy sotsialnoho prostoru [Society, state, economy: patterns of interaction. development of the state through social mechanisms of social space]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia – Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Public management and administration, 53. DOI: 10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2022.1/10. [in Ukrainian]

Ivanov, R., Hurtovyi, Y., Maksyshko, N., Katan, V., & Osypchuk, M. (2025). Modelling the impact of state support types on agricultural production, considering exogenous shock and cyclical factors. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 11(3), 5–45. DOI: 10.51599/are.2025.11.03.01

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316678451

Gabaix, X. (2011). The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 79(3), 733-772. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA8769

Carvalho, V. M., & Grassi, B. (2019). Large firm dynamics and the business cycle. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1375-1425. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20151317

Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., Moussawi, R., & Sedunov, J. (2021). The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors. Management Science, 67(11), 6629–6659. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3808

Войтович, Л., & Федик, М. (2024). Стратегія повоєнного відновлення економіки україни в умовах євроінтеграції. Економіка та суспільство, (65). DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2024-65-112

Ishchuk, S., & Sozanskyy, L. (2025). Structural Transformation in EU Economies: a Possible Development Path for Ukraine. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 39(1), 77-93. DOI: 10.24917/20801653.391.5

Tutaj, J., Rutkowska, M., & Bartoszczuk, P. (2021). Enterprise business architecture as a tool for sustainable development in an enterprise-Case study. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 5050-5057. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.283

Boonstra, W.J. (2024). Malthusianism. In: Warf, B. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25900-5_235-1

Uzoamaka, N. O. P., Ifeoma, A. R., & Nosike, C. J. (2020). Strategic orientation dimensions: A critical review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 4(9), 609-612.

Sojecka, A. A., & Drozd-Rzoska, A. (2025). Verhulst-type equation and the universal pattern for global population growth. PLoS One, 20(5), e0323165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323165

Article views: 10
PDF Downloads: 4
Published
2026-05-25
How to Cite
Ivanov, R., Ivanov, K., & Uhrekhelidze, P. (2026). MODELING THE REVERSE IMPACT OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES ON THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF THE COUNTRY. Economy and Society, (86). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/D2026-86-141