SYNERGY OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND INNOVATIVE RECOVERY OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN THE REGION IN THE FACE OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES
Abstract
The article explores the complex mechanism of interaction between information security measures and the processes of innovative revival of the entrepreneurial sector at the regional level. Amidst contemporary global challenges—ranging from geopolitical instability and military conflicts to the rapid digitalization of the global economy—the security framework is evolving from a mere auxiliary function into a fundamental prerequisite for business survival. The aim of the work is the theoretical substantiation and development of a model of synergy between information security and innovative recovery of entrepreneurship at the regional level as a tool for counteracting global challenges. The scientific novelty of the results lies in the formation of an original approach to understanding information security as a dynamic profit driver rather than just a risk minimization factor. For the first time, a model for optimizing the synergetic effect is proposed, incorporating a digital trust coefficient and probabilistic losses from cyber incidents in correlation with the pace of innovative development. The concept of "cyber resilience" in the context of regional management has been further developed, enabling the substantiation of a complex organizational and managerial mechanism for the implementation of the MIR-model (Model of Innovative Recovery). This model integrates three strategic vectors: technological modernization based on edge computing and blockchain, the creation of Regional Security Operations Centers (R-SOC), and the transformation of regional business processes. The clustering of Ukrainian regions by the Digital Transformation Index (DTI) was conducted, revealing patterns of business adaptation to critical security shocks. The practical significance of the study lies in the applicability of the developed recommendations by regional authorities and business entities to build resilient economic systems. The mathematical framework of the model can be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of cybersecurity investments, while the proposed MIR-model implementation matrix serves as a roadmap for the digital transformation of local communities. The research findings can be integrated into regional development strategies, business financial support programs, and advanced training courses for senior management.
References
Adizes, I. (2018). Upravlinnia zminamy [Managing corporate lifecycles] (Trans. from English). Nash Format. (304 p.).
Castells, M. (2006). Informatsiina epokha: Ekonomika, suspilstvo ta kultura [The information age: Economy, society and culture]. Vakula. (608 p.).
Drucker, P. F. (2007). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. Williams Publishing House. (432 p.).
Резнікова, О. О. (2022). Національна стійкість в умовах мінливого безпекового середовища. НІСД. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2022-03/reznikova-ukraineresilience2022_02.pdf.
East Europe Foundation. (2025). Regional Digital Transformation Index 2025: Analytical report. (84 p.). https://eef.org.ua/indeks-tsyfrovoyi-transformatsiyi-regioniv-2025/
Hallegatte, S. (2022). Build Back Better: Achieving resilience through innovative recovery. World Bank Publications. (214 p.).
Heiets, V. M. (2015). Endohenni resursy ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Endogenous resources of economic development]. Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine. (450 p.).
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2025). Digital Transformation Strategy 2024-2030. (120 p.). https://thedigital.gov.ua/news/strategy2030
Porter, M. E. (2010). On competition. Williams Publishing House. (592 p.).
Schumpeter, J. A. (2011). Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku: Doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle]. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House. (336 p.).
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. (172 p.).
Shaposhnykov, K., Denysiuk, T., & Zakharchenko, O. (2023). Potential for development of entrepreneurship in the period of post-war recovery of the national economy (example of social entrepreneurship). Infrastruktura rynku - Market infrastructure, 72, 51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct72-9
Adizes, I. (2018). Upravlinnia zminamy [Managing corporate lifecycles] (Trans. from English). Nash Format. (304 p.).
Castells, M. (2006). Informatsiina epokha: Ekonomika, suspilstvo ta kultura [The information age: Economy, society and culture]. Vakula. (608 p.).
Drucker, P. F. (2007). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. Williams Publishing House. (432 p.).
Reznikova, O. O. (2022). Natsionalna stiikist v umovakh minlyvoho bezpekovoho seredovyshcha. NISD. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2022-03/reznikova-ukraineresilience2022_02.pdf.
East Europe Foundation. (2025). Regional Digital Transformation Index 2025: Analytical report. (84 p.). https://eef.org.ua/indeks-tsyfrovoyi-transformatsiyi-regioniv-2025/
Hallegatte, S. (2022). Build Back Better: Achieving resilience through innovative recovery. World Bank Publications. (214 p.).
Heiets, V. M. (2015). Endohenni resursy ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Endogenous resources of economic development]. Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine. (450 p.).
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2025). Digital Transformation Strategy 2024-2030. (120 p.). https://thedigital.gov.ua/news/strategy2030
Porter, M. E. (2010). On competition. Williams Publishing House. (592 p.).
Schumpeter, J. A. (2011). Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku: Doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle]. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House. (336 p.).
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. (172 p.).
Shaposhnykov, K., Denysiuk, T., & Zakharchenko, O. (2023). Potential for development of entrepreneurship in the period of post-war recovery of the national economy (example of social entrepreneurship). Infrastruktura rynku - Market infrastructure, 72, 51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct72-9
Copyright (c) 2026 Костянтин Шапошников, Артур Жаворонок

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

