COMPARATIVE FISCAL PARADIGM OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX AND PROFIT TAX: ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL DIMENSION

Keywords: corporate income tax, profit tax, accounting, book-tax differences, tax administration, fiscal paradigm, tax compliance

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the comparative fiscal paradigm of profit tax and corporate income tax through the accounting and analytical dimension in the context of institutional transformation of tax administration and global tax coordination. The research is based on an interdisciplinary approach combining accounting theory, institutional economics and fiscal analysis. Dialectical and comparative methods were used to identify contradictions between financial and tax accounting. The epistemological approach was applied to assess tax uncertainty and professional judgment, while analytical generalisation was used to interpret book-tax differences and tax administration models. It is determined that national profit tax systems remain accounting-centred, where financial results directly influence the tax base through regulatory adjustments. In contrast, corporate taxation in the EU demonstrates greater autonomy of the tax base and stronger institutional coordination. Book-tax differences perform different functions: regulatory in national systems and analytical in EU models. The evolution towards compliance-based tax administration transforms accounting from a control mechanism into an analytical infrastructure for tax risk management. The implementation of Pillar Two strengthens the role of standardized accounting data in corporate taxation. The novelty lies in conceptualising profit tax and corporate income tax as distinct fiscal paradigms rather than alternative technical mechanisms and in reinterpreting book-tax differences as indicators of institutional fiscal tension. The results may be used to improve national tax policy through deeper accounting and analytical adaptation to EU corporate taxation standards. Effective harmonisation of profit taxation with EU corporate tax models requires institutional and analytical transformation of accounting systems under global minimum taxation. In this context, accounting information acquires the status of a key institutional mediator between national tax regulation and supranational fiscal coordination. This shift increases the analytical value of financial reporting for assessing effective tax burdens and fiscal sustainability. Consequently, the accounting and analytical dimension becomes a decisive factor in aligning national profit tax systems with modern EU corporate tax paradigms.

References

Податковий кодекс України : Закон України від 02.12.2010 № 2755-VI (зі змін. і доп.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Волошенюк І. Є. Удосконалення бухгалтерського обліку розрахунків з податку на прибуток. Ефективна економіка. 2017. № 7. URL: https://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5701 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Шкуліпа Л. Методика визначення податкового прибутку згідно норм національного законодавства та МСБО 12 «Податки на прибуток». Економічний аналіз. 2020. Т. 30, № 4. С. 182–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.04.182 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Ковач С., Безверхий К. Облік і звітність розрахунків за податком на прибуток підприємства в умовах законодавчих змін. Бухгалтерський облік і аудит. 2015. № 4. С. 34–43. URL: https://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?2_S21P03=FILA%3D&2_S21STR=boau_2015_4_6&C21COM=S&I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Болдовська К. Теоретичні аспекти податку на прибуток підприємств як облікової категорії. Економіка та суспільство. 2021. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/882 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Іванечко Ю., Маркевич О. Інноваційні підходи до механізму оподаткування прибутку підприємств в Україні. Бухгалтерський облік і аудит. 2014. № 1. С. 31–40. URL: https://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?2_S21P03=FILA%3D&2_S21STR=boau_2014_1_5&C21COM=S&I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Разборська О. Трансформаційні процеси справляння податку на прибуток у контексті переходу до податку на виведений капітал. Економічний аналіз. 2020. Т. 30, № 3. С. 90–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.03.090 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Латковська Т. А. Напрями гармонізації податку на прибуток до вимог Європейського Союзу. Наукові праці Національного університету «Одеська юридична академія». 2021. Т. 28. С. 69–79. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/items/2f46b475-473e-4630-b729-eb3e49ea4381 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Валігура В. Нові ініціативи ЄС у сфері гармонізації корпоративного оподаткування: імплікації для фіскальної політики та адміністрування. Економіка та суспільство. 2025. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/5513 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Сутність імплементації плану BEPS для бюджетно-податкової системи України. Інвестиції: практика та досвід. 2024. URL: https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/investplan/article/download/4309/4344/9981 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Бочаров К. В. Перспективи запровадження глобального мінімального податку в Україні. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. 2025. URL: https://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/338473 (дата звернення: 22.12.2025).

Hanlon M., Heitzman S. A Review of Tax Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2010. Vol. 50, iss. 2–3. P. 127–178. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165410110000340 (date of access: 22.12.2025).

Abdul Wahab N. S., Holland K. The persistence of book-tax differences. The British Accounting Review. 2015. Vol. 47, iss. 4. P. 339–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.002 (date of access: 22.12.2025).

Desai M. A. The Divergence between Book Income and Tax Income. Tax Policy and the Economy. 2003. Vol. 17. P. 169–206. URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/tpe.17.20140508 (date of access: 22.12.2025).

OECD. Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/09/tax-administration-2023_87655bc9.html (date of access: 22.12.2025).

OECD. Co-operative Tax Compliance: Building Better Tax Control Frameworks. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264253384-en (date of access: 22.12.2025).

OECD. Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy: Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two). Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/12/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two_eed81a23/782bac33-en.pdf (date of access: 22.12.2025).

Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 of 14 December 2022 on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union. EUR-Lex. 2022. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2523/oj/eng (date of access: 22.12.2025).

European Commission. Risk Management Guide for Tax Administrations. Version 1.02. February 2006. URL: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/risk_management_guide_for_tax_administrations_en.pdf (date of access: 22.12.2025).

International Accounting Standards Board. IAS 12 Income Taxes. IFRS. URL: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-12-income-taxes/ (date of access: 22.12.2025).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy [Tax Code of Ukraine]: Law of Ukraine No. 2755-VI of December 2, 2010 (as amended). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 (accessed 22 December 2025).

Volosheniuk, I. Ye. (2017). Udoskonalennia bukhhalterskoho obliku rozrakhunkiv z podatku na prybutok [Improvement of accounting for corporate income tax settlements]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 7. Available at: https://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5701 (accessed 22 December 2025).

Shkulipa, L. (2020). Metodyka vyznachennia podatkovoho prybutku zghidno norm natsionalnoho zakonodavstva ta MSBO 12 “Podatky na prybutok” [Methodology for determining taxable profit under national legislation and IAS 12 “Income Taxes”]. Ekonomichnyi analiz, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 182–194. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.04.182

Kovach, S., Bezverkhyi, K. (2015). Oblik i zvitnist rozrakhunkiv za podatkom na prybutok pidpryiemstva v umovakh zakonodavchykh zmin [Accounting and reporting of corporate income tax settlements under legislative changes]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, no. 4, pp. 34–43. Available at: https://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua (accessed 22 December 2025).

Boldovska, K. (2021). Teoretychni aspekty podatku na prybutok pidpryiemstv yak oblikovoi katehorii [Theoretical aspects of corporate income tax as an accounting category]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/882 (accessed 22 December 2025).

Ivanechko, Yu., Markevych, O. (2014). Innovatsiini pidkhody do mekhanizmu opodatkuvannia prybutku pidpryiemstv v Ukraini [Innovative approaches to the mechanism of corporate income taxation in Ukraine]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, no. 1, pp. 31–40. Available at: https://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua (accessed 22 December 2025).

Razborska, O. (2020). Transformatsiini protsesy spravliannia podatku na prybutok u konteksti perekhodu do podatku na vyvedenyi kapital [Transformational processes of corporate income tax administration in the context of transition to a tax on withdrawn capital]. Ekonomichnyi analiz, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 90–100. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.03.090

Latkovska, T. A. (2021). Napriamy harmonizatsii podatku na prybutok do vymoh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Directions of harmonization of corporate income tax with the requirements of the European Union]. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho universytetu “Odeska yurydychna akademiia”, vol. 28, pp. 69–79. Available at: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua (accessed 22 December 2025).

Valihura, V. (2025). Novi initsiatyvy YeS u sferi harmonizatsii korporatyvnoho opodatkuvannia: implikatsii dlia fiskalnoi polityky ta administruvannia [New EU initiatives in the field of corporate tax harmonization: implications for fiscal policy and administration]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/5513 (accessed 22 December 2025).

Sutnist implementatsii planu BEPS dlia biudzhetno-podatkovoi systemy Ukrainy [The essence of BEPS plan implementation for the budgetary and tax system of Ukraine]. (2024). Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid. Available at: https://www.nayka.com.ua (accessed 22 December 2025).

Bocharov, K. V. (2025). Perspektyvy zaprovadzhennia hlobalnoho minimalnoho podatku v Ukraini [Prospects for the introduction of a global minimum tax in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Available at: https://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/338473 (accessed 22 December 2025).

Hanlon, M., Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 50, iss. 2–3, pp. 127–178.

Abdul Wahab, N. S., Holland, K. (2015). The persistence of book-tax differences. The British Accounting Review, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.002

Desai, M. A. (2003). The divergence between book income and tax income. Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 17, pp. 169–206.

OECD. (2023). Tax administration 2023: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2016). Co-operative tax compliance: Building better tax control frameworks. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264253384-en

OECD. (2021). Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy: Global anti-base erosion model rules (Pillar Two). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523. (2022). On ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union. EUR-Lex. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed 22 December 2025).

European Commission. (2006). Risk management guide for tax administrations (Version 1.02). Available at: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu (accessed 22 December 2025).

International Accounting Standards Board. IAS 12 income taxes. IFRS. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org (accessed 22 December 2025).

Article views: 2
PDF Downloads: 1
Published
2025-11-24
How to Cite
Kraevskyi, V., Skoryk, M., & IvanyshynaО. (2025). COMPARATIVE FISCAL PARADIGM OF CORPORATE INCOME TAX AND PROFIT TAX: ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL DIMENSION. Economy and Society, (81). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-81-157
Section
ACCOUNTING AND TAXATION