USING THE EXPERT METHOD IN SUBSTANTIATING MANAGEMENT DECISIONS IN RISK CONDITIONS
Abstract
The article is devoted to the issue of assessing the level of risk impact on the results of the economic activities of organizations. The purpose of the article is to study approaches to identifying and assessing risks in the process of making management decisions under conditions of uncertainty. To solve the research goal, the analysis method was used to determine subgroups and types of risks, establish the features of individual types of risk, the synthesis method for further grouping of risks, and the expert method for assessing risks. It was proposed to assess groups of external and internal risks. Experts rated external risks higher than internal ones. Among external risks, subgroups of political, economic, market, legal, social, demographic, and scientific and technical risks were assessed. According to the respondents, economic risks have the greatest impact. Among the group of internal risks, it was proposed to highlight informational, organizational, scientific, financial, managerial, reputational, material and technical risks, and risks of professional liability. Experts recognized financial risks as the most influential. For further detailing the assessment of individual types of risks inherent in the economic activities of healthcare institutions and the pharmaceutical business, twelve types of risks were identified. The risks proposed for assessment are the lack of qualified personnel and financing, incorrect pricing policy and financial planning, untimely renewal of the material base, increased costs and decreased demand, significant competition and loss of customers, cyberattacks and data loss, unstable economic situation, professional risks, force majeure. Experts most highly assessed the level of impact of insufficient financing of activities. Despite the significance of risk management problems, the absence of a risk manager position in the organizational structure of the vast majority of healthcare institutions was revealed. However, almost all respondents noted a significant list of risk management measures implemented by their employers. The practical value of the study lies in assessing the risks of economic activities, identifying the most significant risks, the impact of which must be taken into account when making management decisions.
References
Рудніченко Є., Гавловська Н., Красноштан В. Ранжування видів ризику в залежності від вагомості наслідків небезпеки зовнішнього та внутрішнього середовища організацій. Modelling the development of the economic systems. 2021. № 1. С. 66–70. URL: https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2021-1-8 (дата звернення: 18.12.2025).
Таралло В.Л. Фактори ризику: методика визначення, оцінка, використання в охороні здоров’я. Україна. Здоров’я нації. 2019. № 1(54). С. 92–98.
Цопа В.А., Яворська О.О., Брезіцька М.С., Чеберячко С.І., Дерюгін О.В., Яворський А.В. Аналіз моделей керування професійними ризиками за міжнародними стандартами. Проблеми охорони праці в Україні. 2022. № 38(3–4). С. 16–24. URL: https://doi.org/10.36804/nndipbop.38(3-4).2022.16-24 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Цопа В.А, Чеберячко С.І., Яворська О.О., Дерюгін О.В., Брезіцька М.С., Бехтер О.А. Аналіз термінології управління ризиками в системах управління охороною здоров’я та безпекою працівників. Проблеми охорони праці в Україні. 2024. № 40(1–2). С. 10–21. URL: https://doi.org/10.36804/nndipbop 40-1-2.2024.10-21 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Омельчак Г. Парадигма процесу управління ризиками підприємств в сучасних умовах. International Science Journal of Management, Economics & Finance. 2025. № 4(4). С. 62–70. URL: https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjmef.20250404.06 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Ultimate Guide to AI Risk Scoring in Healthcare. Censinet. URL: https://www.censinet.com/perspectives/ultimate-guide-to-ai-risk-scoring-in-healthcare (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Jeynes C., Clifford N., Callaghan I., Thorpe N., Crosbie B., Forsyth K., Fazel S., Whiting D. Collaborative risk assessment and management planning in secure mental health services in England: protocol for a realist review. 2025. BMJ Open. № 15. URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099747 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Biju A., Thomas A., Thasneem J. Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere – a bibliometric analysis. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Doyle M., Grundy A., McGleenan K., Nash M., Deering, K. Clinical Risk Management in Mental Health Services: 10 Principles for Best Practice. International journal of mental health nursing. 2024. № 34. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13458 (дата звернення: 19.12.2025).
Rudnichenko Ye., Havlovska N., & Krasnoshtan V. (2021). Ranzhuvannia vydiv ryzyku v zalezhnosti vid vahomosti naslidkiv nebezpeky zovnishnoho ta vnutrishnoho seredovyshcha orhanizatsii [Ranking of risk types depending on the severity of the consequences of the danger of the external and internal environment of organizations]. Modelling the development of the economic systems, vol. 1, pp. 66–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2021-1-8 (accessed December 18, 2025).
Tarallo V.L. (2019). Faktory ryzyku: metodyka vyznachennia, otsinka, vykorystannia v okhoroni zdorovia [Risk factors: methods of identification, assessment, use in health care]. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii – Ukraine. Health of the nation, vol. 1(54), pp. 92–98.
Tsopa V.A., Yavorska O.O., Brezitska M.S., Cheberiachko S.I., Deriuhin O.V., & Yavorskyi A.V. (2022). Analiz modelei keruvannia profesiinymy ryzykamy za mizhnarodnymy standartamy [Analysis of occupational risk management models according to international standards]. Problemy okhorony pratsi v Ukraini –Occupational health and safety problems in Ukraine, vol. 38(3–4), pp. 16–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36804/nndipbop.38(3-4).2022.16-24 (accessed December 19, 2025).
Tsopa V.A, Cheberiachko S.I., Yavorska O.O., Deriuhin O.V., Brezitska M.S., Bekhter O.A. (2024). Analiz terminolohii upravlinnia ryzykamy v systemakh upravlinnia okhoronoiu zdorovia ta bezpekoiu pratsivnykiv [Analysis of risk management terminology in occupational health and safety management systems]. Problemy okhorony pratsi v Ukraini – Occupational health and safety problems in Ukraine, vol. 40(1–2), pp. 10–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36804/nndipbop 40-1-2.2024.10-21 (accessed December 19, 2025).
Omelchak H. (2025). Paradyhma protsesu upravlinnia ryzykamy pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh umovakh [Paradigm of the enterprise risk management process in modern conditions]. International Science Journal of Management, Economics & Finance, vol. 4(4), pp. 62–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjmef.20250404.06 (accessed December 19, 2025).
Ultimate Guide to AI Risk Scoring in Healthcare. Censinet. Available at: https://www.censinet.com/perspectives/ultimate-guide-to-ai-risk-scoring-in-healthcare (accessed December 19, 2025).
Jeynes C., Clifford N., Callaghan I., Thorpe N., Crosbie B., Forsyth K., Fazel S., Whiting D. (2025). Collaborative risk assessment and management planning in secure mental health services in England: protocol for a realist review. BMJ Open, vol. 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099747 (accessed December 19, 2025).
Biju A., Thomas A., Thasneem J. Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere – a bibliometric analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0 (accessed December 19, 2025).
Doyle M., Grundy A., McGleenan K., Nash M., Deering, K. (2024). Clinical Risk Management in Mental Health Services: 10 Principles for Best Practice. International journal of mental health nursing, vol. 34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13458 (accessed December 19, 2025).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
