THE ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC LEADERSHIP IN SHAPING FUTURE INNOVATORS
Abstract
Scientific leadership plays a key role in shaping future innovators by creating a favorable environment for research, creativity and interdisciplinary collaboration. Universities and research institutions are implementing mentoring programs that promote the development of critical thinking, scientific ethics and professional growth of young researchers. The study analyses models of scientific leadership, including transformational and participatory leadership, and their impact on researcher productivity, career success, and the effectiveness of mentoring programs. The results show that institutional support, quality mentoring and leadership skills of researchers contribute to the creation of an innovative environment. The practical value of the study lies in the development of recommendations for the application of forms and methods of strengthening scientific leadership in educational and research institutions. By developing interdisciplinary cooperation and international partnerships, strengthening research infrastructure, and investing in leadership development, Ukrainian universities can effectively compete in the global academic environment.
References
Altbach P. G. Globalization and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world // Tertiary Education & Management. 2004. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2004.9967114. (accessed January 22, 2025)
Arnold E. Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities// Research Evaluation. 2004. Vol. 13, No. 1. P. 129-140. DOI: 10.3152/147154404781776464 (accessed January 22, 2025)
Bass B. M., Riggio R. E. Transformational leadership. 2nd ed. Psychology Press, 2006. DOI: 10.4324/9781410617095 (accessed January 22, 2025)
Bercovitz J., Feldman M. Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level // Organization Science. 2008. Vol. 19, No. 1. P. 69–89. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0295. (accessed January 22, 2025)
Bozeman B., Boardman C. Research collaboration and team science: A review of current literature and recommendations for future research. Springer, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06468-0. (accessed January 22, 2025)
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media, 1985. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 (accessed January 22, 2025)
Dweck C. S. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, 2006. Retrieved from: https://adrvantage.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Mindset-The-New-Psychology-of-Success-Dweck.pdf . (accessed January 22, 2025)
Eagly A. H., Carli L. L. Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press, 2007. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.th/books/about/Through_the_Labyrinth.html?id=b2kf_B_4f0kC&redir_esc=y (accessed January 27, 2025)
Lillian T. Eby., Tammy D. Allen. Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals// Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2008. Vol. 72, No. 2. P. 254–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005. (accessed January 27, 2025)
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations // Research Policy. 2000. Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4. (accessed January 27, 2025)
Falk-Krzesinski H. J. Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science // Research Evaluation. 2011. Vol. 20, No. 2. P. 145–158. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876580. (accessed February 7, 2025)
Fecher B., Friesike S. Open science: One term, five schools of thought // Opening science / Ed. S. Bartling, S. Friesike. Springer, 2014. P. 17–47. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2 (accessed February 6, 2025)
Feynman R. P. The meaning of it all: Thoughts of a citizen-scientist. Perseus Publishing, 1998. Retrieved from: https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/meaning-of-it-all.pdf (accessed February 7, 2025)
Freeman R. B., Huang W. Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic co-authorship within the US // Journal of Labor Economics. 2015. Vol. 33, No. S1. P. S289–S318. DOI: 10.1086/678973. (accessed February 6, 2025)
Gibbons M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, 1994. DOI: 10.4135/9781446221853
Harvard Catalyst. Mentorship in clinical and translational research: Mentorship and trainings. Retrieved from: https://catalyst.harvard.edu/mentorship-in-clinical-and-translational-research/mentorship-and-trainings/ (accessed February 7, 2025)
Kenney M. Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. Stanford University Press, 2000. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37702342_Understanding_Silicon_Valley_The_Anatomy_of_an_Entrepreneurial_Region (accessed February 7, 2025)
Kram K. E. Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Scott, Foresman & Co., 1985. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232463073_Mentoring_at_Work_Developmental_Relationships_in_Organisational_Life (accessed January 25, 2025)
Kotter J. P. Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press, 2012. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279179997_Leading_Change (accessed January 27, 2025)
National Science Foundation. The power of mentoring: NSF Research Traineeship program. Retrieved https://www.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/nrt/power-mentoring-nsf-research-traineeship-program from: (accessed February 7, 2025)
Resnik D. B. The ethics of science: An introduction. Routledge, 2007. Retrieved from: https://courses.smp.uq.edu.au/STAT1201/2010a/lectures/readings/Ethics_of_Science.pdf (accessed January 27, 2025)
Saxenian A. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, 1994. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/144358 (accessed January 27, 2025)
Shamoo A. E., Resnik D. B. Responsible conduct of research. 3ed ed. Oxford University Press, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Resnik-2/publication/233745581_Responsible_Conduct_of_Research/links/5e80987692851caef4a96c37/Responsible-Conduct-of-Research.pdf 2014. (accessed January 29, 2025)
Shavinina L. V. The Routledge international handbook of innovation education. Routledge, 2013.Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Routledge-International-Handbook-of-Innovation-Shavinina/6ca015e9a6aeb8f4472e03af289c56f3f4c9355d (accessed January 27, 2025)
Vroom V. H., Jago A. G. The role of the situation in leadership // American Psychologist. 2007. Vol. 62, No. 1. P. 17–24. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.17. (accessed January 25, 2025)
Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2013. Retrieved from: https://nibmehub.com/opac-service/pdf/read/Leadership%20in%20Organizations%20by%20Gary%20Yukl.pdf (accessed January 27, 2025)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
