RESILIENCE OF REGIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE AND RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION OF TOURISM RESOURCES: ECOLOGY, ECONOMY, AND SOCIETY
Abstract
The research found that the concept of resilience is an important tool in understanding and ensuring the sustainability of systems at various levels, including economic, social and environmental. The resilience of territories and communities in the context of tourism is of particular importance, as it provides a balance between the development of the tourism industry and the preservation of environmental stability, social justice and economic benefits. It has been proven that in the context of constant changes associated with the transformation of property relations, global challenges and risks, the importance of resilience becomes critical. Tourism, as one of the most important sectors of the economy, can contribute to the development of regions, but for this it is necessary to ensure a sustainable approach to the use of resources, which includes environmental safety, effective management and human resource development. Given these factors, the development of territorial resilience is recognized as the basis for sustainable consumption of tourism resources. At the same time, it was found that insufficient attention to the connection between environmental security and socio-economic development leads to risks of inefficient use of resources and threats to the sustainability of local communities. The relevance of this topic is increasing in the context of global changes, such as climate change, war, epidemics, which threaten the stability of economic and social systems, especially in the context of recovery from crisis situations. To achieve sustainable development goals, it is necessary to take into account the interrelationship of the environmental, economic and social spheres, developing effective strategies for the development of tourism activities within the regions. In the future, it remains important to take into account risks, identify internal sources of resilience and find ways to adapt, which is the basis for the development of resilient territories. With the help of comprehensive tools based on the assessment of local resources, social norms and economic capital, it is possible to create conditions for sustainable development of communities. This allows not only to prevent negative consequences, but also to create opportunities for positive economic, social and environmental impact on regions with tourism potential. Given the current challenges, such approaches are necessary for achieving success in the field of sustainable tourism and efficient use of resources.
References
Пирожков С., Божок Є., Хамітов Н. Резильєнтність: Стратегія виживання в умовах гібридних загроз. URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/3265105-rezilentnist-strategia-vizivanna-v-umovah-gibridnih-zagroz.html
Davies S. Regional resilience in the 2008–2010 downturn: comparative evidence from European countries. Camb J Reg Econ Soc. 2011. № 4 (3). Pp. 369-382.
Череватський Д.Ю. Резильєнтність економіки та економіка резильєнтності. Економіка промисловості. 2023. No 1. С. 31–39. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2023.01.031
Інституційні інструменти ефективного природокористування: монографія / за наук. ред. акад. НАН України Е.М. Лібанової. Київ: Інститут демографії та проблем якості життя Національної академії наук України, 2024. 186 с.
Хвесик, М., Обиход, Г., Мандзик, В. Інституційні інструменти забезпечення резильєнтності природно-ресурсного комплексу: безпековий аспект. Економіка України. 2024. 08 (753). С. 77-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.08.077
Burger J., Gochfeld M., Kosson D.S., Brown K.G., Salisbury J.A., Jeitner C. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Environmental Research. 2020. Volume 186.
Valderrábano, M., Nelson, C., Nicholson, E., Etter, A. Using ecosystem risk assessment science in ecosystem restoration: A guide to applying the Red List of Ecosystems to ecosystem restoration. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2021.
Хвесик, М., Бистряков, І., Клиновий, Д. Природні ресурси у фінансово-економічному забезпеченні розвитку об’єднаної територіальної громади (рекомендації для місцевих лідерів та керівників ОТГ). Київ: ДУ ІЕПСР НАН України, 2018. 36 с. URL: https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/news/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=4593
Хвесик, М., Бистряков, І., Обиход, Г. Економіка природокористування: глосарій основних термінів. 2-ге вид., доп. Київ: ДУ ІЕПСР НАН України, 2022. 118 с.
Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). A systemic resilience approach to dealing with Covid-19 and future shocks. Paris, April 2020.
Pirozhkov S., Bozhok Y., Khamitov N. (n.d.) Rezylientnist: Stratehiya vyzhyvannya v umovakh hibridnykh zahroz [Resilience: The Survival Strategy in the Context of Hybrid Threats]. Ukrinform. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/3265105-rezilentnist-strategia-vizivanna-v-umovah-gibridnih-zagroz.html (accessed December 14, 2025).
Davies S. (2011). Regional resilience in the 2008–2010 downturn: comparative evidence from European countries. Camb J Reg Econ Soc, 4(3), 369-382.
Cherevatskyi D. Y. (2023). Rezylientnist ekonomiky ta ekonomika rezylientnosti [Resilience of the Economy and the Economy of Resilience]. Ekonomika promyslovosti, No 1, 31–39. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2023.01.031 (in Ukrainian)
Instytutsiini instrumenty efektyvnoho pryrodokorystuvannya: monohrafiya [Institutional Tools for Effective Environmental Management: Monograph] / za nauk. red. ak. NAN Ukrainy E. M. Libanovoi. (2024). Kyiv: Instytut demohrafii ta problemm yakosti zhyttya Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy, 186 s. (in Ukrainian)
Khvesyk, M., Obikhod, H., Mandzyk, V. (2024). Instytutsiini instrumenty zabezpechennya rezylientnosti pryrodno-resursnoho kompleksu: bezpekovyi aspekt [Institutional Tools for Ensuring Resilience of the Natural Resource Complex: Security Aspect]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 67(8), 77-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.08.077 (in Ukrainian)
Burger J., Gochfeld M., Kosson D.S., Brown K.G., Salisbury J.A., Jeitner C. (2020). Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Environmental Research, Volume 186.
Valderrábano, M., Nelson, C., Nicholson, E., Etter, A., Carwardine, J., Hallett, J.G., McBreen, J., Botts, E. (2021). Using ecosystem risk assessment science in ecosystem restoration: A guide to applying the Red List of Ecosystems to ecosystem restoration. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Khvesyk, M., Bystrykov, I., Klynovyi, D. (2018). Pryrodni resursy u finansovo-ekonomichnomu zabezpechenni rozvytku obiednanoi terytorialnoi hromady (rekomendatsii dlya miscevykh lideriv ta kerivnykiv OTH) [Natural Resources in the Financial and Economic Support of the Development of the United Territorial Community (Recommendations for Local Leaders and Hromada Managers)]. Kyiv: DU IIEPSR NAN Ukrainy, 36 р. Available at: https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/news/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=4593 (in Ukrainian) (accessed December 14, 2020).
Khvesyk, M., Bystrykov, I., Obikhod, H. (2022). Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannya: hlosariy osnovnykh terminiv [Economics of Natural Resource Use: Glossary of Key Terms]. 2-he vyd., dop. Kyiv: DU IIEPSR NAN Ukrainy, 118 s. (in Ukrainian)
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2020). A systemic resilience approach to dealing with Covid-19 and future shocks. Paris, April 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
