ASSESSING THE RISKS OF ENERGY SHORTAGES AND THEIR IMPACT ON OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The article looks into the essence of energy deficit risks that belong to an objective category of risks and their operational management consequences on the one hand and in the business environment on the other. With continually increasing energy demands coupled with variable supply conditions, organizations in multiple sectors are now facing a greater responsibility for better understanding the makeup of energy deficit risk. Price volatility, supply chain disruptions, geopolitical uncertainties or any other issue that can manifest in the operational challenges is covered in this category. This study defines energy deficit risks and contextualizes it within the larger framework of operational risk management. How the risks emerge from both external factors (like market dynamics and political instability), and internal factors (poor energy use and poor contingency planning) is highlighted by it. This article aims to give a comprehensive overview of the sources and manifestations of energy deficit risks with the intention to enable managers to be able to deal with the energy management complexities. Additionally, the article elaborates on the direct effects of energy deficits on operational efficiency. Energy shortages create disruptions in the production schedule of businesses, increase operating costs, and thwart achievement of consumer demand. Not only does these challenges affect the organisation’s performance, but this also refers to sustainability and competitiveness in the market. The article also outlines different strategies that a company can take to lower energy deficit risks alongside the challenges. The strategies in question include diversifying sources of energy, making investments in energy efficient technologies, and carrying out investment in demand side management. An organization can build resilience to energy supply fluctuations and the impacts of energy deficits by introducing a proactive approach for energy management. Overall, this article adds to the existing body of knowledge of operational risk management by discussing energy deficit risks in detail and highlighting their implications to business. This presents a need for in-depth research in this important area and provides support for consideration of energy management in operational strategies. Through this, the article aims to assist practitioners in finding effective energy management frameworks that also safeguard their operations while helping lead to a cleaner and more efficient energy future.
References
Losada-Agudelo M., Souyris S. Sustainable operations management in the energy sector: A comprehensive review of the literature from 2000 to 2024. Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16, No. 18. P. 7999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187999
Li B. Leading role of natural resources, eco-efficiency assessment, and energy transition in environmental sustainability: A depth of digital transformation. Resources Policy. 2024. Vol. 94. P. 105145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105145
Generalov O. Analysis of modern trends and opportunities in the logistics channels of energy products producers. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2024. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 39–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-1-39-43
Prokopenko O., Chechel A., Koldovskiy A., Kldiashvili M. Innovative models of green entrepreneurship: Social impact on sustainable development of local economies. Economics Ecology Socium. 2024. Vol. 8, No. 1. P. 89–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.1-8
Sanko H., Koldovskyi A. Analysis of consumers' innovation efficiency: changes of the consumption patterns in the Ukrainian society over the last 25 years. Geopolitics under Globalization. 2017. Vol. 1, No. 2. P. 4–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/gg.01(2).2017.01
Ghazanfari A. An analysis of circular economy literature at the macro level, with a particular focus on energy markets. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, No. 5. P. 1779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041779
Giri B. K., Roy S. K. Fuzzy-random robust flexible programming on sustainable closed-loop renewable energy supply chain. Applied Energy. 2024. Vol. 363. P. 123044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123044
Le Luu Q., Longo S., Cellura M., Riva Sanseverino E., Cusenza M. A., Franzitta V. A conceptual review on using consequential life cycle assessment methodology for the energy sector. Energies. 2020. Vol. 13, No. 12. P. 3076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123076
Pender K., Romoli F., Fuller J. Lifecycle assessment of strategies for decarbonising wind blade recycling toward net zero 2050. Energies. 2024. Vol. 17, No. 8. P. 3008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17123008
Yudha S. W., Tjahjono B., Longhurst P. Sustainable transition from fossil fuel to geothermal energy: A multi-level perspective approach. Energies. 2022. Vol. 15, No. 21. P. 7435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197435
Krishankumar R., Ramanujam N., Zavadskas E. K., Ravichandran K. S., Gandomi A. H. Ranking barriers impeding sustainability adoption in clean energy supply chains: A hybrid framework with Fermatean fuzzy data. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2024. Vol. 71, No. 4. P. 5506–5522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3350249
Dabić M., Vlačić B., Kiessling T., Caputo A., Pellegrini M. Serial entrepreneurs: A review of literature and guidance for future research. Journal of Small Business Management. 2021. Vol. 61, No. 3. P. 1107–1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1969657
Environmental Protection Agency. Global greenhouse gas overview. 2023. URL: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-overview
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Mitigation of climate change, Chapter 2. IPCC, 2022. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
International Monetary Fund. IMF annual report. IMF Policy Paper. Washington, D.C., USA, 2023. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2023/
International Renewable Energy Agency. World energy transitions outlook 2023. 2023. URL: https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023
Ричка Р. Ю. Економічний аналіз ефективності інвестицій у сонячну енергетику: Окупність, доходність, ризики. Економіка та суспільство. 2024. № 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-60-146.
Losada-Agudelo M., Souyris S. (2024) Sustainable operations management in the energy sector: A comprehensive review of the literature from 2000 to 2024. Sustainability. Vol. 16, No. 18, P. 7999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187999
Li B. (2024) Leading role of natural resources, eco-efficiency assessment, and energy transition in environmental sustainability: A depth of digital transformation. Resources Policy. Vol. 94, P. 105145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105145
Generalov O. (2024) Analysis of modern trends and opportunities in the logistics channels of energy products producers. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 39–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-1-39-43
Prokopenko O., Chechel A., Koldovskiy A., Kldiashvili M. (2024) Innovative models of green entrepreneurship: Social impact on sustainable development of local economies. Economics Ecology Socium. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 89–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.1-8
Sanko H., Koldovskyi A. (2017) Analysis of consumers' innovation efficiency: changes of the consumption patterns in the Ukrainian society over the last 25 years. Geopolitics under Globalization. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 4–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/gg.01(2).2017.01
Ghazanfari A. (2023) An analysis of circular economy literature at the macro level, with a particular focus on energy markets. Energies. Vol. 16, No. 5, P. 1779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041779
Giri B. K., Roy S. K. (2024) Fuzzy-random robust flexible programming on sustainable closed-loop renewable energy supply chain. Applied Energy. Vol. 363, P. 123044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123044
Le Luu Q., Longo S., Cellura M., Riva Sanseverino E., Cusenza M. A., Franzitta V. (2020) A conceptual review on using consequential life cycle assessment methodology for the energy sector. Energies. Vol. 13, No. 12, P. 3076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123076
Pender K., Romoli F., Fuller J. (2024) Lifecycle assessment of strategies for decarbonising wind blade recycling toward net zero 2050. Energies. Vol. 17, No. 8, P. 3008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17123008
Yudha S. W., Tjahjono B., Longhurst P. (2022) Sustainable transition from fossil fuel to geothermal energy: A multi-level perspective approach. Energies. Vol. 15, No. 21, P. 7435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197435
Krishankumar R., Ramanujam N., Zavadskas E. K., Ravichandran K. S., Gandomi A. H. (2024) Ranking barriers impeding sustainability adoption in clean energy supply chains: A hybrid framework with Fermatean fuzzy data. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 5506–5522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3350249
Dabić M., Vlačić B., Kiessling T., Caputo A., Pellegrini M. (2021) Serial entrepreneurs: A review of literature and guidance for future research. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 1107–1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1969657
Environmental Protection Agency (2023) Global greenhouse gas overview. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-overview
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022) Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Mitigation of climate change, Chapter 2. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
International Monetary Fund (2023) IMF annual report. IMF Policy Paper. Washington, D.C., USA. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2023/
International Renewable Energy Agency (2023) World energy transitions outlook 2023. Available at: https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023
Richka R. Yu. (2024) Ekonomichnyi analiz efektyvnosti investytsii u sonyachnu energetyku: Okupnist, dokhidnist, ryzyky [Economic analysis of the efficiency of investments in solar energy: Payback, profitability, risks]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economics and Society]. No. 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-60-146 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.