COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN STRATEGIC PLANNING MODELS AND THEIR INTEGRATION WITH EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Abstract
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of strategic planning models, organizing complex concepts into a systematic comparison to aid scholars and professionals in selecting and using appropriate models for different organizational scenarios. It includes a variety of models that cover a wide spectrum from basic to advanced, addressing the challenges of implementation in contemporary business environments. The article establishes a central structure by outlining essential elements that are common to strategic planning models, such as the definition of a vision, the establishment of goals, and the construction of strategies. A comprehensive comparison table is provided, which includes full descriptions, appropriate settings, and implementation techniques for each model. This table aims to enhance clarity and facilitate comprehension. The purpose of this table is to standardize the way varied models are presented, which improves the practical application and instructional usefulness of strategic planning theories. This work aims to bridge the gap between theoretical complexity and practical applicability, providing a valuable tool for informed decision-making in strategic planning. The study discusses the inherent challenges in scientific writing on strategic planning, which include dealing with abstract concepts, integrating various models, and translating theory into practical strategies. The target audience consists of a heterogeneous collection of readers from many fields, aiming to improve understanding and strategic approaches across a broad spectrum of industries and organizational frameworks.
References
Beard, D., & Dess, G. (1981). Corporate-level strategy, business-level strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 663-688. Retrieved January 31, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.
Betz, F. (2002). Strategic business models. Engineering Management Journal, 14, (1), 1-21. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.
Błaszczyk, M. (2017). Market and Competitive Determinants of Strategy in the Process of Strategic Analysis – Toward Comprehensive and Integrated Approach.
Flemming, Paul. (2014). A review of strategic planning models developed over the past 50 years, and their effectiveness in public sector organizations. 10.13140/2.1.4314.7044.
Freni, P., Ferro, E., & Moncada, R. (2022). Tokenomics and blockchain tokens: A design-oriented morphological framework. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 3(1), 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100069
Guth, W. (1980). Corporate growth strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1(2), 56. Retrieved January 31, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.
Kaufman, R., & Herman, J. (1991). Strategic planning for a better society. Educational Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roger-Kaufman2/publication/237507956_Strategic_Planning_for_a_Better_Society_Strategic_planners_must_have_the_courage_to_imagine_the_world_they_want_their_children_to_live_in_then_find_practical_ways_to_achieve_their_vision/links/555f199008ae9963a115727c/Strategic-Planning-for-a-Better-Society-Strategic-planners-must-have-the-courage-to-imagine-the-world-they-want-their-children-to-live-in-then-find-practical-ways-to-achieve-their-vision.pdf
Kim, W. C. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: from theory to practice. California management review, 47(3), 105-121.
Marko, R., & Kost'al, K. (2022). Management of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems (COINS), 1-8.
Saurabh, K., Rani, N., & Upadhyay, P. (2022). Towards blockchain led decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) business model innovations. Benchmarking: An International Journal.
Shuajibi, E., & Rahmani, M. (2018). Methods and techniques for efficient strategic planning. Knowledge International Journal.
Wright, P., Pringle, D., Kroll, M. J. (1994). Strategic Management. Text and Cases. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
