INNOVATIVE FACTOR OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES
Abstract
Corruption is a global problem that seriously damages societies and economies. Thanks to innovations and modern technologies, there are new opportunities to fight this phenomenon. Innovations in this area can include technological solutions, social programs and legislative changes that aim to ensure transparency, efficiency and accountability. The analysis of foreign experience in combating corruption can help to choose a set of effective anti-corruption measures from the world experience, and to understand, first of all, that corruption can be combated in the conditions of Ukraine. Secondly, that there are experience-tested principles and methods of effective anti-corruption, as well as indicators that make it possible to reasonably judge the level of effectiveness of applied anti-corruption measures. At the same time, we believe that the combination of the socio-cultural aspect and anti-corruption innovations will be the most effective. The purpose of the research is to investigate the main types of innovations related to the implementation of anti-corruption policy. The study determined that innovation is an important tool in the fight against corruption. They help create effective and sustainable mechanisms to combat this phenomenon, ensuring transparency, efficiency and accountability. Innovation can change culture and value systems, helping to build a fair, equal and developed society. Some innovative tools that can help in the fight against corruption are considered. It was determined that institutional innovations play an important role in the fight against corruption, as they are aimed at changing the legal, organizational and institutional frameworks that regulate the functioning of society. They contribute to the creation of transparent, accountable and effective mechanisms that limit opportunities for corrupt practices and contribute to the construction of an honest and just society. The most important ideas of institutional theory, important for the implementation of anti-corruption institutional innovations, were noted: The analysis of the EU experience in the field of implementation of institutional innovations made it possible to highlight the main strategies for their implementation. The main examples of institutional innovations against corruption in the EU are considered. Among the EU's anti-corruption policy tools, "Quick-win" projects are highlighted – scientific projects aimed at solving current problems and achieving results in the short term.
References
Alm J., Torgler B. Culture Differences and Tax Morale in United States and Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2006. No 27.
Torgler B. The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity. Journal of EconomicBehavior and Organization, 2005.
Dell’Anno R. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2009. Vol. 38. Issue 6.
Torgler B., Schneider F. The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2009. No 2.
Spitaler A. Die gegenseitige Annäherung der Steuersysteme der Kulturstaaten. In: ArminSpitaler (ed.): Probleme des Finanz- und Steuerrechts – Festschrift für Ottmar Bühler. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 1954.
Pausch A. Persönlichkeiten der Steuerkultur – Steuergeschichte in Lebensbildern von Johannes v. Miquel bis Armin Spitaler. Herne. Berlin: Verlag Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe, 1992.
Buszko A.T. Cultural Implications for the Shadow Economy. Engineering Economics. 2018. Vol. 29 (1). Рр. 46–52.
Achim M.V., Borlea S.N., Vasile G.L., Alin A.M. The Shadow Economy and Culture: Evidence in European Countries. Eastern European Economics. 2019. 57:5. Рр. 352–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1614461
Alarcón-García G., Azorín J. D. B., de la Vega M. del M. S. Shadow economy and national culture: A spatial approach. Hacienda Pública Española. Review of Public Economics IEF. 2020. Vol. 232 (1). Рр. 53–74.
Культура влияет на коррупцию. URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/177667678.html
Данилишин Б. Можно ли победить теневую экономику? LB.UA. 5 липня 2017. URL: https://lb.ua/blog/bogdan_danylysyn/370673_mozhno_li_pobedit_tenevuyu_ekonomiku.html
Гендер и коррупция: что мы знаем? Дискуссионный доклад. URL: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/7/529545.pdf
World Value Survey. URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp.
Сборник материалов по исследованию зарубежного опыта противодействия коррупции. АПК РК 2020. URL: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/anticorruption/press/article/details/2281?lang=ru
Омельяненко В. Аналіз архетипного виміру інституційно-еволюційних траєкторій впровадження системних інновацій. Публічне урядування. 2020. № 1 (21). С. 220–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-220-233
Омельяненко В., Омельяненко О., Вернидуб М. Наукові засади аналітичного підходу до формування та оцінювання ефективності інноваційної політики в контексті сталого розвитку. Економіка та суспільство. 2022. № 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-42-88
Omelyanenko V. National strategic innovation security policy making (theoretical review). Tallinn. Teadmus, 2020. 300 p.
Alm, J., Torgler, B. (2006). Culture Differences and Tax Morale in United States and Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27.
Torgler, B. (2005). The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity. Journal of EconomicBehavior and Organization.
Dell’Anno, R. (2009). Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (6).
Torgler, B., Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2.
Spitaler, A. (1954). Die gegenseitige Annäherung der Steuersysteme der Kulturstaaten. In: ArminSpitaler (ed.): Probleme des Finanz- und Steuerrechts – Festschrift für Ottmar Bühler.Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG.
Pausch, A. (1992). Persönlichkeiten der Steuerkultur – Steuergeschichte in Lebensbildern von Johannes v. Miquel bis Armin Spitaler. Herne. Berlin: Verlag Neue Wirtschafts-Briefe.
Buszko, A. T. (2018). Cultural Implications for the Shadow Economy. Engineering Economics, 29 (1), 46–52.
Achim, M. V., Borlea, S. N., Vasile, G. L., Alin, A. M. (2019). The Shadow Economy and Culture: Evidence in European Countries. Eastern European Economics, 57:5, 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1614461
Alarcón-García, G., Azorín, J. D. B., de la Vega, M. del M. S. (2020). Shadow economy and national culture: A spatial approach. Hacienda Pública Española. Review of Public Economics IEF, 232(1), 53–74.
Culture influences corruption. URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/177667678.html [in Russian].
Danylyshyn, B. (2017). Is it possible to defeat the shadow economy? LB.UA. URL: https://lb.ua/blog/bogdan_danylysyn/370673_mozhno_li_pobedit_tenevuyu_ekonomiku.html
Gender and corruption: what do we know? Discussion report. URL: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/7/529545.pdf
World Value Survey. URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
Collection of materials on the study of foreign experience in combating corruption. APK RK 2020. URL: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/anticorruption/press/article/details/2281?lang=ru
Omelyanenko, V. (2020). Analysis of the archetypal dimension of institutional-evolutionary trajectories of the introduction of system innovations. Public administration, 1 (21), 220–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-220-233 [in Ukrainian]
Omelyanenko, V., Omelyanenko, O., Vernydub, M. (2022). Scientific principles of the analytical approach to the formation and evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative policy in the context of sustainable development. Economy and society, 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-42-88 [in Ukrainian]
Omelyanenko, V. (2020). National strategic innovation security policy making (theoretical review). Tallinn. Teadmus.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
