INCLUSIVENESS OF UNITED TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES AND DISTRICTS OF UKRAINE

Keywords: inclusiveness, convergence, continuity, united territorial communities, districts, levels of rural-urban agglomerations

Abstract

The article highlights an actual scientific problem related to the continuous-convergent context of the inclusiveness of the united territorial communities (UTC) and districts as rural-urban agglomeration formations. In the process of research, was formulate dthe tasks of determining the essence of inclusiveness of these socio-spatial formations, analyzing the gradual development of inclusiveness in rural-urban agglomerations of Ukraine, revealing its differences. In order to implement these tasks, the theoretical achievements of Ukrainian and foreign scientists on issues of inclusive development, systemic and synergistic approaches, methods of comparison, analysis and synthesis were creatively used. To assess the degree and level of inclusiveness of these rural-urban spatial formations, the inclusive development index presented in 2018 at the 48th World Economic Forum, which is calculated on the basis of 12 indicators, namely: growth and development (GDP growth, employment, productivity labor, life expectancy); inclusiveness (median household income, poverty level and social stratification); succession of generations and sustainability (level of savings, demographic burden, public debt and environmental pollution). It has been proven that the decentralization of public power and management started in 2015 through the unification of territorial communities and the formation of new districts (year 2020) created the prerequisites for overcoming socio-economic inequality between the city and the countryside. The administrative method of forming a certain prototype of the inclusion of rural and urban communities within the UTC and districts is considered as the first step towards the real integration of rural and urban communities. Taking into account the presence of stable traditions regarding the study of the phenomenon of inclusiveness in Western countries, the expediency of creative use of the experience of these countries, as well as developing countries, is emphasized. Based on the results of the research, it was established that there is a risk of forming a rural-urban inclusive environment with a dominant rural component, with its established marginality and peripherality. In order to prevent this risk, the conditions for creating an integrated inclusive space are outlined, in which the advantages of rural and urban ways of life are converted and the interests of different communities are taken into account. It was concluded that the most relevant direction of further scientific research regarding the process of formation of inclusive UTCs and districts is tracking the rural or urban focus of this process.

References

Gupta J., Vegelin C. (2016) Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements, Volume 16 (3). Р. 433–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z

Hay С., Hunt Т. & McGregor J. А. (2020) Inclusive growth: the challenges of multidimensionality and multilateralism. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2020.1784849. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09557571.2020.1784849?needAccess=true (дата звернення: 14.09.2022).

Woods M., Heley J. (2017) Conceptualisation of Rural-Urban Relations and Synergies. URL: https://rural-urban.eu/sites/default/files/D1-1%20Conceptualisation%20of%20Rural-Urban%20Relations%20and%20Synergies.pdf (дата звернення: 13.09.2022).

Brand U., Boos Т., Brad А. (2017) Degrowth and post-extractivism: two debates with suggestions for the inclusive development framework. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Volume 24. P. 36-41.

Cottyn І. (2020) Between modern urbanism and ‘rurban’ realities. Rwanda’s changing rural-urban interface and the implications for inclusive development. 187 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33540/47

McGranahan G., Schensul D., Singh G.(2016) Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment & Urbanization. Volume 28 (1). Р. 13–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522

Zhiheng Yang, Nengneng Shen, Yanbo Qu and Bailin Zhang (2021) Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111228. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1228 (дата звернення: 04.09.2022).

Структурні зміни як основа інклюзивного розвитку економіки України : монографія [Бобух І.М., Кіндзерський Ю.В., Фащевська О.М. та ін.]; за ред. д.е.н. І.М. Бобух. Київ : ДУ «Інститутт економіки та прогнозування НАН України», 2020. 516 с.

Інклюзивний сільський розвиток в Україні : монографія; за ред. д-ра екон. наук, проф., чл.-кор. НАН України О.М. Бородіної. Київ : ДУ «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України». 2020. 257 с.

Попадинець Н.М. Пріоритети інклюзивного розвитку регіонів України. Вісник Сумського національного аграрного університету. Серія «Економіка і менеджмент». 2019. Випуск 2 (80). С. 91‒93.

Снігова О.Ю. Просторовий вимір інклюзивності в умовах становлення «нової» регіональної політики. Український географічний журнал. 2020. № 2 (110). С. 38‒44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.038

The Inclusive Development Index 2018 Summary and Data Highlights. World Economic Forum. URL: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf (дата звернення: 23.09.2022).

World Bank (2013) Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity. New Frontiers of Social Policy. Washington, DC. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16195 (дата звернення: 24.09.2022).

Цимбалюк І. Оцінка інклюзивного розвитку регіонів України. Електронний журнал Східноєвропейського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. 2019. № 4 (20). С. 157–165.

Gupta, J., Vegelin, C. (2016) Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements, vol. 16 (3), pp. 433–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z

Hay, С., Hunt, Т. & J. McGregor, А. (2020) Inclusive growth: the challenges of multidimensionality and multilateralism. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2020.1784849. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09557571.2020.1784849?needAccess=true (accessed 14 September 2022).

Woods, M., Heley, J. (2017) Conceptualisation of Rural-Urban Relations and Synergies. Available at: https://rural-urban.eu/sites/default/files/D1-1%20Conceptualisation%20of%20Rural-Urban%20Relations%20and%20Synergies.pdf (accessed 13 September 2022).

Brand, U., Boos, Т., Brad, А. (2017) Degrowth and post-extractivism: two debates with suggestions for the inclusive development framework. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 24, pp. 36-41.

Cottyn, І. (2020) Between modern urbanism and ‘rurban’ realities. Rwanda’s changing rural-urban interface and the implications for inclusive development, 187 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33540/47

McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., Singh, G. (2016). Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment & Urbanization, vol. 28 (1), pp. 13–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522

Zhiheng, Yang, Nengneng, Shen, Yanbo Qu and Bailin Zhang (2021). Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111228. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1228 (accessed 04 September 2022).

Bobukh, I.M., & Kindzersjkyj, Ju.V., & Fashhevsjka, O.M. (2020) Strukturni zminy jak osnova inkljuzyvnogho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrajiny [Structural changes as the basis of inclusive development of the economy of Ukraine]. I.M. Bobukh (Eds.). Kyiv: DU «Instytutt ekonomiky ta proghnozuvannja NAN Ukrajiny». (in Ukrainian)

Borodinoji, O.M. (2020) Inkljuzyvnyj siljsjkyj rozvytok v Ukrajini [Inclusive rural development in Ukraine] (PhD Thesis), Kyiv: State University «Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine». (in Ukrainian)

Popadynecj, N.M. (2019) Priorytety inkljuzyvnogho rozvytku reghioniv Ukrajiny [Priorities of inclusive development of regions of Ukraine]. Visnyk Sumsjkogho nacionaljnogho aghrarnogho universytetu, vol. 2 (80), pp. 91‒93. (in Ukrainian)

Snighova, O.Ju. (2020) Prostorovyj vymir inkljuzyvnosti v umovakh stanovlennja «novoji» reghionaljnoji polityky [Spatial dimension of inclusiveness in the conditions of formation of «new» regional policy]. Ukrajinsjkyj gheoghrafichnyj zhurnal, vol. 2 (110), pp. 38‒44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.038 (in Ukrainian)

The Inclusive Development Index (2018) Summary and Data Highlights. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf (accessed 23 September 2022).

World Bank (2013) Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity. New Frontiers of Social Policy. Washington, DC. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16195 (accessed 24 September 2022).

Tsymbaliuk, I. (2019) Otsinka inkliuzyvnoho rozvytku rehioniv Ukrainy [Evaluation of the inclusive development of the regions of Ukraine]. Elektronnyi zhurnal Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, vol. 4 (20), pp. 157–165. (in Ukrainian)

Article views: 243
PDF Downloads: 208
Published
2022-08-30
How to Cite
Pavlov, O., Pavlova, I., & Pavlov – junior, O. (2022). INCLUSIVENESS OF UNITED TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES AND DISTRICTS OF UKRAINE. Economy and Society, (42). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-42-82
Section
ECONOMICS