GENESIS OF METHODOLOGY OF THE INVESTMENT THEORY
Abstract
The article indicated the absence of prevailing investment market, manifested through low development of financial infrastructure, low liquidity of domestic enterprises, low income levels, all this negatively affects the investment climate in Ukraine. It is substantiated, that in the order to ensure sustainable development the country needs to attract financial resources, and to do this to consolidate domestic and international capital in the form of investment. In order to study conditions of the equilibrium in the domestic investment market to do genesis of methodology of the investment theory. In the research used methods of analysis, synthesis, scientific abstraction, comparative analysis, logical generalization. The stages of the formation of the fundamental provisions of economic theory are analyzed, namely the views of scientists on the importance place of the capital in the development of the country's economy. It is noted that mercantilists pointed to the need for investment in the production of the goods, which they considered the foundation of foreign trade and the wealth of the nation. Scientists whom representatives of the classical school distinguished between the concepts of money and capital, they substantiated the importance of savings and credit money in the formation of the investment process. In the article we noted that Keynesianism and Neoclassicism have had a powerful influence on the formation and the development of the school of institutionalism, which focused on the role of social, political and economic organizations in determining of economic phenomena. The main idea of scientists of the school of institutionalism is to attract capital to the scientific, personnel and technical potential. In the article explores the contribution of domestic scientists in the evolution methodology of the theory of investment: phenomenological alternative of the economic growth; the analysis of the influence of cyclicity and crises of the world economy on economic progress; the search for ways to update the idea of economic development. According to the results of the analysis, it is concluded that to ensure sustainable development of the country it is necessary to implement the strategy of investment development of Ukraine’s economy through investment and innovation policy, a set of economic, organizational and legal, financial and credit and other states.
References
Левина, Л.Ф. (2000). Теории инвестиционных решений. Энциклопедия менеджмента, № 2, С. 87.
Блауг, М. (1994). Экономическая мысль в ретроспективе. Москва: «Дело ЛТД».
Смит, А. (2007). Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. Москва: Эксмо.
Мазурок, П.П. (2006). Історія економічних учень у запитаннях та відповідях. Київ: Знання.
Милль, Дж.С. (1993). Основы политической экономии с некоторыми приложениями их к социальной философии. Москва: Экономика.
Кейнс, Дж.М. (1999). Трактат про грошову реформу. Загальна теорія зайнятості, процента та грошей. Реферат-дайджест. Київ: Знання.
Кейнс, Дж.М. (2001). «Конец laissez – faire». Перевод: Е.В. Виноградова. Москва: ГУ–ВШЭ.
Keynes, J.A. (1925). Short View on Russia. L.: Hogarth Press.
Кейнс, Дж.М. (2002). Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. Москва: Гелиос АРВ.
Державне регулювання економіки. (2000). За ред. І.Р. Михасюка. Київ: Атіка, Ельга-Н.
Domar, E. (1957). Essay in the Theory of Economics Growth. N.Y.
Harrod, R. (1973). Economic Dynamics. London: Macmillan.
Solow, Robert M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3).
The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics. (1992). Edited by David W. Pearce and Robert Shaw. MIT Press, Vol. 17: 209.
Король, М.М. (2013). Генезис і еволюція кейнсової теорії та кейнсіанства, її вплив на становлення та розвиток науково-кадрового потенціалу. Економіка. Управління. Інновації, № 2 (10), С. 1–16.
Данилишин, Б.М., Микитенко, В.В. (2008). Феноменологічні альтернативи економічного зростання України: моногр. у 2 т. Київ: Нічлава.
Гальчинський, А.С. (2010). Кризис и циклы мирового развития. Київ: АДЕФ–Украина.
Пасічник, Ю.В. (2005). Бюджетний потенціал економічного зростання. Донецьк, Юго-Восток, ЛТД.
Хорос, В.Г. (2007). Идея развития: возможность обновления. Мировая єкономика и международніе отношения, №2, С. 75–89.
Levin, L.F. (2000). Teorii investitsionnykh resheniy [Theory of investment solutions]. Entsiklopediya menedzhmenta – Encyclopedia Management, 2, 87. [In Russian].
Blaug, M. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya mysl' v retrospektive [Economic thought in retrospect]. Moscow: «Case LTD». [In Russian].
Smith, A. (2007). Issledovaniye o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Research on nature and causes of wealth of peoples]. Moscow: Eksmo. [In Russian].
Mazurok, P.P. (2006). Istoriya ekonomichnykh uchen’u zapytannyakh ta vidpovidyakh [History of economic disciples in questions and answers]. Kiev: Knowledge. [In Ukrainian].
Mill, J.S. (1993). Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii s nekotorymi prilozheniyami ikh k sotsial'noy filosofii [Basics of political economy with some applications of them to social philosophy]. Moscow: Economy. [In Russian].
Keynes, J.M. (1999). Traktat pro hroshovu reformu. Zahal’na teoriya zaynyatosti, protsenta ta hroshey [A treatise on monetary reform. General theory of employment, percentage and money]. Digest. Kiev: Knowledge. [In Ukrainian].
Keynes, J.M. (2001). «Konets laissez – faire» [«End of Laissez – Faire»]. Translation: E.V. Vinogradov. Moscow: GU-HSE. [In Russian].
Keynes, J.A. (1925). Short View on Russia. L.: Hogarth Press.
Keynes, J.M. (2002). Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [General theory of employment, percentage and money]. Moscow: Helios ARV. [In Russian].
Derzhavne rehulyuvannya ekonomiky [State regulation of the economy]. (2000). Ed. I.R. Mikhayuk. Kiev: Atika, Elga N. [In Ukrainian].
Domar, E. (1957). Essay in the Theory of Economics Growth. N.Y.
Harrod, R. (1973). Economic Dynamics. London: Macmillan.
Solow, Robert M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3).
The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics. (1992). Edited by David W. Pearce and Robert Shaw. MIT Press, Vol. 17: 209.
Korol, M.M. (2013). Henezys i evolyutsiya keynsovoyi teoriyi ta keynsianstva, yiyi vplyv na stanovlennya ta rozvytok naukovo-kadrovoho potentsialu [Genesis and Evolution of Keynesic Theory and Keynesianism, its influence on the formation and development of scientific and personnel potential]. Ekonomika. Upravlinnya. Innovatsiyi – Economy. Management. Innovation, 2 (10), 1–16. [In Ukrainian].
Danilishin, B.M., Mikitenko, V.V. (2008). Fenomenolohichni al’ternatyvy ekonomichnoho zrostannya Ukrayiny [Phenomenological alternatives to Ukraine's economic growth]. Monogr. In 2 t. Kyiv: Nichlava. [In Ukrainian].
Galchinsky, A.S. (2010). Krizis i tsikly mirovogo razvitiya [Crisis and world development cycles]. Kyiv: Adef-Ukraine. [In Russian].
Pasichnyk, Yu.V. (2005). Byudzhetnyy potentsial ekonomichnoho zrostannya [Budget potential of economic growth]. Donetsk, Yuga Vostok, Ltd. [In Ukrainian].
Khoros, V.G. (2007). Ideya razvitiya: vozmozhnost' obnovleniya [Development Idea: Ability to update]. Mirovaya êkonomika i mezhdunarodníe otnosheniya – World Economics and International Relations, 2, 75–89. [In Russian].
