DEFINITIONAL-COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS EFFECTIVENESS OF A BUSINESS ENTITY’S ACTIVITIES
Abstract
The article presents the results of a definitional and comparative analysis of the concept of “effectiveness of a business entity’s activities” and its correlation with international approaches to enterprise assessment. The study proceeds from the problem that, in Ukrainian economic and auditing discourse, the term “effectiveness” is used in several close but not identical meanings: as a general characteristic of successful activity, as a ratio between resources and results, and as one of the criteria of performance audit. This creates terminological uncertainty and may narrow the analytical interpretation of enterprise performance. The relevance of the issue is strengthened by the need to align national analytical and audit terminology with the requirements of financial control and managerial accountability. Particular attention is paid to the 3E approach, within which economy, efficiency and effectiveness require a clearer Ukrainian distinction. To avoid the overlap between the general concept of effectiveness and the narrower resource-based meaning of efficiency, the translation “resource efficiency” is proposed. Based on Ukrainian and foreign sources, the article argues that the effectiveness of a business entity’s activities should not be reduced to financial performance or current business results. It is interpreted as a broader economic and analytical category that includes financial and non-financial outcomes, resources, internal processes, management, control, stakeholder value, adaptability, prerequisites for going concern and long-term resilience. The article also adapts a categorical model of business entity effectiveness, using the hierarchy of financial performance, business performance and organizational effectiveness as a conceptual basis. This model makes it possible to distinguish the outcome dimension from the organizational conditions that ensure the achievement of these outcomes. As a result, the definition of the studied category is clarified, and a further research direction is outlined: the transition from definitional ordering to the development of indicators, analytical dashboards and methodological tools for internal performance audit.
References
Council of the European Union. EU and Ukraine open first accession negotiations cluster. 15 June 2026. URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/06/15/eu-and-ukraine-open-first-accession-negotiations-cluster/ (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
European Commission. Ukraine 2024 Report: Commission Staff Working Document. SWD (2024) 699 final. Brussels, 30.10.2024. URL: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/ukraine-report-2024_en (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Держаудитслужба. Стандарт (методика) проведення Державною аудиторською службою, її міжрегіональними територіальними органами державного фінансового аудиту ефективності. URL: https://dasu.gov.ua/attachments/af955072-aff1-4789-9727-3273c6d03833_%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%20_%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%A2%D0%9E%D0%94%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.doc (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
INTOSAI. ISSAI 300: Performance Audit Principles. 2019. URL: https://www.intosai.org/fileadmin/downloads/documents/open_access/ISSAI_100_to_400/issai_300/ISSAI_300_en_2019.pdf (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
INTOSAI. ISSAI 3000: Performance Audit Standard. 2019. URL: https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ISSAI-3000-Performance-Audit-Standard.pdf (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Пащенко О. П., Васьківський О. П., Куліш Н. Теоретичні аспекти оцінки ефективності менеджменту підприємства. Приазовський економічний вісник. 2020. № 1(18). С. 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/2522-4263/2020-1-22 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Лозовський О. М., Горшков М. А. Ефективність управлінських рішень в менеджменті організації. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. № 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-86 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Дума О. І., Курчаба О. В. Модель оцінювання ефективності управління медичним закладом в умовах реформування галузі охорони здоровʼя. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Економіка. 2024. № 19. С. 221–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2024.19.27 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Пророк В. В. Ефективність корпоративного управління: інструментарій вимірювання та взаємозв’язок з реформами власності. Економіка та підприємництво. 2024. № 52. С. 200–211. DOI: http://doi.org/10.33111/EE.2024.52.ProrokV (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Камишникова Е. В., Верескун М. В., Верзілова К. С. Використання таксономічного аналізу для оцінки рівня організаційної ефективності промислових підприємств. Вісник Приазовського державного технічного університету. Серія: Економічні науки. 2023. № 1(38). С. 81–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31498/2225-6725.1(38).2023.287465 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Ворончак І. О., Солтисік О. О. Генезис та трансформація стратегічного управління людськими ресурсами як драйвера організаційної ефективності: теоретико-історичний аспект. Економічний простір. 2026. № 211. С. 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.211.101-109 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review. 1986. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 801–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Xu Y., Zhao J., Fang Q., Wang H., Wang D., Zeng B., Wang Y. The Theory and Method of Organizational Effectiveness Evaluation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022). 2022. Vol. 664. P. 2419–2423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.437 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Gehringer T. How Managerial Practices Impact Perceived Organizational Effectiveness: A Study of Corporate Foundations. Administrative Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14, № 5. Article 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050096 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Nel P., Kotze M., Badarai E. Psychometric Properties of an Organisational Effectiveness Measure for State-Owned Enterprises. Acta Commercii. 2023. Vol. 23, № 1. Article a1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v23i1.1049 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Negi P., Jaiswal A., Rekunenko I. Supply Chain Resilience, Organizational Effectiveness, and Firm Performance: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. SAGE Open. 2025. Vol. 15, № 4. Article 21582440251393994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251393994 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Min J. Organizational Learning, Problem-Solving Competency, and Effectiveness in Online Travel Agencies: The Moderating Role of Digital Empowerment. Sustainability. 2026. Vol. 18, № 2. Article 563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020563 (дата звернення: 29.06.2026).
Council of the European Union. (2026, June 15). EU and Ukraine open first accession negotiations cluster. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/06/15/eu-and-ukraine-open-first-accession-negotiations-cluster/ (accessed June 29, 2026).
European Commission. (2024). Ukraine 2024 report: Commission staff working document (SWD (2024) 699 final). https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/ukraine-report-2024_en (accessed June 29, 2026).
Derzhaudytsluzhba. Standart (metodyka) provedennia Derzhavnoiu audytorskoiu sluzhboiu, yii mizhrehionalnymy terytorialnymy orhanamy derzhavnoho finansovoho audytu efektyvnosti [Standard (methodology) for conducting public financial performance audit by the State Audit Service and its interregional territorial bodies]. Available at: https://dasu.gov.ua/attachments/af955072-aff1-4789-9727-3273c6d03833_%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%20_%D0%9C%D0%95%D0%A2%D0%9E%D0%94%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%90.do c (accessed June 29, 2026).
International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2019). ISSAI 300: Performance audit principles. https://www.intosai.org/fileadmin/downloads/documents/open_access/ISSAI_100_to_400/issai_300/ISSAI_300_en_2019.pdf (accessed June 29, 2026).
International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2019). ISSAI 3000: Performance audit standard. https://www.issai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ISSAI-3000-Performance-Audit-Standard.pdf (accessed June 29, 2026).
Pashchenko O. P., Vaskivskyi O. P., Kulish N. (2020) Teoretychni aspekty otsinky efektyvnosti menedzhmentu pidpryiemstva [Theoretical aspects of evaluating the effectiveness of enterprise management]. *Pryazovskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk – Pryazovskyi Economic Herald, vol. 1(18), pp. 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/2522-4263/2020-1-22 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Lozovskyi O. M., Horshkov M. A. (2023) Efektyvnist upravlinskykh rishen v menedzhmenti orhanizatsii [The effectiveness of management decisions in organization management]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society, no. 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-86 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Duma O. I., Kurchaba O. V. (2024) Model otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti upravlinnia medychnym zakladom v umovakh reformuvannia haluzi okhorony zdorovia [Model for assessing the efficiency of medical institution management under healthcare reform]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika – Tavrian Scientific Bulletin. Series: Economics, vol. 19, pp. 221–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2024.19.27 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Prorok V. V. (2024) Efektyvnist korporatyvnoho upravlinnia: instrumentarii vymiriuvannia ta vzaiemozviazok z reformamy vlasnosti [Efficiency of corporate governance: measurement toolkit and relationship with ownership reforms]. Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo – Economy and Entrepreneurship, no. 52, pp. 200–211. DOI: http://doi.org/10.33111/EE.2024.52.ProrokV (accessed June 29, 2026).
Kamyshnykova E. V., Vereskun M. V., Verzilova K. S. (2023) Vykorystannia taksonomichnoho analizu dlia otsinky rivnia orhanizatsiinoi efektyvnosti promyslovykh pidpryiemstv [Using taxonomic analysis to assess the level of organizational efficiency of industrial enterprises]. Visnyk Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky – Bulletin of Pryazovskyi State Technical University. Series: Economic Sciences, no. 1(38), pp. 81–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31498/2225-6725.1(38).2023.287465 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Voronchak I. O., Soltysik O. O. (2026) Henezys ta transformatsiia stratehichnoho upravlinnia liudskymy resursamy yak draivera orhanizatsiinoi efektyvnosti: teoretyko-istorychnyi aspekt [Genesis and transformation of strategic human resource management as a driver of organizational effectiveness: theoretical and historical aspect]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic Space, no. 211, pp. 101–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.211.101-109 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. (1986) Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 801–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Xu Y., Zhao J., Fang Q., Wang H., Wang D., Zeng B., Wang Y. (2022) The theory and method of organizational effectiveness evaluation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 664, pp. 2419–2423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.437 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Gehringer T. (2024) How managerial practices impact perceived organizational effectiveness: a study of corporate foundations. Administrative Sciences, vol. 14, no. 5, article 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050096 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Nel P., Kotze M., Badarai E. (2023) Psychometric properties of an organisational effectiveness measure for state-owned enterprises. Acta Commercii, vol. 23, no. 1, article a1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v23i1.1049 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Negi P., Jaiswal A., Rekunenko I. (2025) Supply chain resilience, organizational effectiveness, and firm performance: a systematic review and future research agenda. SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 4, article 21582440251393994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251393994 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Min J. (2026) Organizational learning, problem-solving competency, and effectiveness in online travel agencies: the moderating role of digital empowerment. Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 2, article 563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020563 (accessed June 29, 2026).
Copyright (c) 2026 Станіслав Костак, Каріна Назарова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

