ANALYTICAL SUPPORT FOR CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES

Keywords: risk management, analytical support, analytical support system for risk management, information and analytical system, decision support, predictive analytics, digital transformation, company

Abstract

The article investigates the theoretical and methodical foundations of analytical support for corporate risk management in the context of increasing uncertainty, digital transformation, and the growing complexity of the contemporary risk environment. The study substantiates the need to move from the use of separate analytical tools toward the formation of an integrated analytical support system that combines information resources, analytical methods, predictive models, digital technologies, and decision-support mechanisms within a unified information and analytical environment. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the theoretical and methodological foundations of analytical support for corporate risk management, clarify its conceptual essence, identify its key functions and structural components, systematize modern analytical tools, and develop a conceptual model of an integrated analytical support system. The study proposes an original definition of analytical support for corporate risk management, which, unlike existing approaches, conceptualizes it as an integrated system that ensures the continuous identification, analysis, assessment, forecasting, and monitoring of risks while supporting risk-oriented managerial decision-making. The study identifies the key functions and structural components of the system, classifies contemporary analytical tools according to their functional purpose and analytical complexity, and develops a conceptual model reflecting the interaction of its main components and the continuous analytical cycle of risk management. The proposed approach contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the role of analytical support in enhancing the effectiveness and adaptability of corporate risk management systems. The practical significance of the obtained results lies in the possibility of applying the proposed conceptual approach and model to improve corporate risk management systems, strengthen information and analytical support, enhance the quality of managerial decision-making, and increase the resilience and long-term competitiveness of companies under contemporary challenges.

References

Чирак І. Сучасні підходи до ризик-менеджменту компаній в умовах економічної невизначеності та турбулентності. Галицький економічний вісник. 2026. Т. 99. № 2. С. 62–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2026.02.062 (дата звернення 03.07.2026).

Brandtner P. Predictive analytics and intelligent decision support systems in supply chain risk management – Research directions for future studies. Digital Supply Chains: Smart and Sustainable Operations. 2022. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_50 (дата звернення 04.07.2026).

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Enterprise Risk Management: Integrating with Strategy and Performance. New York, 2017. URL: https://static.poder360.com.br/2023/09/Diretriz-Enterprise-Risk-Management-Coso-2017.pdf (дата звернення 04.07.2026).

Cornwell N., Bilson C., Gepp A., Stern S., Vanstone B. The role of data analytics within operational risk management: A systematic review from the financial services and energy sectors. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2041373 (дата звернення 07.07.2026).

Deloitte. Assessing AI's Impact on Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). 2025. URL: https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/services/consulting/research/third-party-risk-management-survey.html (дата звернення 05.07.2026).

Dianti A. R. Enhancing financial risk management in the digital age: A systematic review. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting. 2023. Vol. 7, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54518/art.7.2.2023.514 (дата звернення 09.07.2026).

IFRS Foundation. IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. 2026. URL: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/ (дата звернення 07.07.2026).

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management – Guidelines. Geneva: ISO, 2018. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html (дата звернення 10.07.2026).

Jamarani A., Haddadi S., Sarvizadeh R., Kashani M. H., Akbari M., Moradi S. Big data and predictive analytics: A systematic review of applications. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2024. Vol. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10811-5 (дата звернення 05.07.2026).

Mekimah S., Zighed R., Mili K., Bengana I. Business intelligence in organizational decision-making: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and gaps (2014–2024). Discover Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00692-7 (дата звернення 06.07.2026).

Phillips-Wren G., Daly M., Burstein F. Reconciling business intelligence, analytics and decision support systems: More data, deeper insight. Decision Support Systems. 2021. Vol. 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113560 (дата звернення 11.07.2026).

Tian X., Tian Z., Khatib S. F. A., Wang Y. Machine learning in internet financial risk management: A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE. 2024. Vol. 19, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300195 (дата звернення 10.07.2026).

Wissuchek C., Zschech P. Prescriptive analytics systems revised: A systematic literature review from an information systems perspective. Information Systems and e-Business Management. 2025. Vol. 23, No. 2. P. 279–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00688-w (дата звернення 06.07.2026).

World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2025. 20th ed. Geneva : World Economic Forum, 2025. URL: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/ (дата звернення 03.07.2026).

Zio E., Miqueles L. Digital twins in safety analysis, risk assessment and emergency management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2024. Vol. 246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110040 (дата звернення 04.07.2026).

Chyrak I. (2026). Suchasni pidkhody do ryzyk-menedzhmentu kompanii v umovakh ekonomichnoi nevyznachenosti ta turbulentnosti [Modern approaches to corporate risk management under economic uncertainty and turbulence]. Halytskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk – Galician Economic Bulletin, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 62–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2026.02.062 (accessed July 03 2026) (in Ukrainian).

Brandtner P. (2022). Predictive analytics and intelligent decision support systems in supply chain risk management – Research directions for future studies. Digital Supply Chains: Smart and Sustainable Operations. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_50 (accessed July 04 2026).

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2017). Enterprise Risk Management: Integrating with Strategy and Performance. New York. Available at: https://static.poder360.com.br/2023/09/Diretriz-Enterprise-Risk-Management-Coso-2017.pdf (accessed July 04 2026).

Cornwell N., Bilson C., Gepp A., Stern S., Vanstone B. (2022). The role of data analytics within operational risk management: A systematic review from the financial services and energy sectors. Journal of the Operational Research Society. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2041373 (accessed July 07 2026).

Deloitte (2025). Assessing AI's Impact on Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM). Available at: https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/services/consulting/research/third-party-risk-management-survey.html (accessed July 05 2026).

Dianti A. R. (2023). Enhancing financial risk management in the digital age: A systematic review. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting, vol. 7, no. 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54518/art.7.2.2023.514 (accessed July 09 2026).

IFRS Foundation (2026). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/ (accessed July 07 2026).

International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management – Guidelines. Geneva: ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html (accessed July 10 2026).

Jamarani A., Haddadi S., Sarvizadeh R., Kashani M. H., Akbari M., Moradi S. (2024). Big data and predictive analytics: A systematic review of applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10811-5 (accessed July 05 2026).

Mekimah S., Zighed R., Mili K., Bengana I. (2024). Business intelligence in organizational decision-making: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and gaps (2014–2024). Discover Sustainability, vol. 5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00692-7 (accessed July 06 2026).

Phillips-Wren G., Daly M., Burstein F. (2021). Reconciling business intelligence, analytics and decision support systems: More data, deeper insight. Decision Support Systems, vol. 146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113560 (accessed July 11 2026).

Tian X., Tian Z., Khatib S. F. A., Wang Y. (2024). Machine learning in internet financial risk management: A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300195 (accessed July 10 2026).

Wissuchek C., Zschech P. (2025). Prescriptive analytics systems revised: A systematic literature review from an information systems perspective. Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 279–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00688-w (accessed July 06 2026).

World Economic Forum (2025). Global Risks Report 2025. 20th ed. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/ (accessed July 03 2026).

Zio E., Miqueles L. (2024). Digital twins in safety analysis, risk assessment and emergency management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110040 (accessed July 04 2026).

Article views: 4
PDF Downloads: 5
Published
2026-08-12
How to Cite
Chyrak, I. (2026). ANALYTICAL SUPPORT FOR CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES. Economy and Society, (88). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-88-43