ASSESSMENT OF THE RECREATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THE NATURE RESERVE FUND OF UKRAINE
Abstract
The relevance of the study is driven by the urgent need to identify internal reserves for Ukraine’s development in the context of war-related destruction, territorial losses, and the disruption of traditional economic ties. Protected areas are viewed as a strategic resource combining unique natural, cultural, and recreational opportunities that can serve as a basis for new forms of employment, the development of ecosystem services markets, regional branding, and innovative bioeconomic initiatives. The purpose of the article is to assess the resource potential of Ukraine’s protected areas, with a particular emphasis on the recreational component as the most promising in terms of socio-economic recovery and integration into European environmental policy. The methodology of the research combines systemic, spatial-geographical, and eco-economic approaches, applying quantitative analysis of national park performance indicators, SWOT analysis of internal and external development factors, and comparative evaluation of international practices. Elements of analytical modeling were used to outline possible scenarios for land use under war-related risks and post-war recovery needs. The results demonstrate the significant but underutilized potential of Ukraine’s protected areas. Large national parks were found to combine high ecological value, international status, and tourist attractiveness, yet their effectiveness is hindered by weak infrastructure, limited financial resources, and fragmented land use. The research highlighted that the recreational component is the most convertible into added value, capable of generating revenue from tourism, creating jobs, supporting related industries, and enhancing the attractiveness of territories. At the same time, substantial losses of resource potential due to war emphasize the urgency of creating effective mechanisms for recovery and integration into regional development strategies. The practical value of the study lies in providing a scientifically grounded basis for improving the management of the protected area system.
References
Сегеда І.В. Методичні підходи до оцінки природних ресурсів для забезпечення раціонального використання природно-ресурсних комплексів. Вісник Донецького національного університету. Серія В: Економіка і право. 2013. № 2. URL: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ru&user=cTob-AwAAAAJ&citation_for_view=cTob-AwAAAAJ:maZDTaKrznsC
Соловій І.П., Бурда Ю.А. Методологічні особливості оцінювання екосистемних послуг у лісових екосистемах у межах природоохоронних територій. Науковий вісник НЛТУ України. 2022. Т. 32, № 3. С. 37–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36930/40320306
Гетьман В.І. Ландшафтне різноманіття охоронних ландшафтів: критерії оцінки. Наукові записки. Біологія та екологія. 2007. Вип. 67. С. 44–49. URL: https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/
Руденко Л.Г., Голубцов О.Г., Чехній В.М., Маруняк Є.О., Лісовський С.А. Методологія та практика оцінювання території України для заповідання: монографія. Київ: Наукова думка, 2020. URL: https://igu.org.ua/node/171
Pisani D., Pazienza P., Perrino E.V., Caporale D., De Lucia C. The economic valuation of ecosystem services of biodiversity components in protected areas: A review for a framework of analysis for the Gargano National Park. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111726
Hummel C., Poursanidis D., Orenstein D., Elliott M., Adamescu M.C., Cazacu C., Ziv G., Chrysoulakis N., van der Meer J., Hummel H. Protected area management: Fusion and confusion with the ecosystem services approach. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 651(Part 2):2432–2443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.033
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). URL: https://iucn.org/
Сталий розвиток природно-заповідного фонду України: виклики, міжнародна співпраця та перспективи. 09.02.2025. URL: https://livingplanet.org.ua/novuny/stalij-rozvitok-prirodno-zapovidnogo-fondu-ukrajini-vikliki-mizhnarodna-spivpratsya-ta-perspektivi
Війною уражено понад 20% природоохоронних територій України. Міністерство захисту довкілля та природних ресурсів України. 06.11.2023. URL: https://mepr.gov.ua/vijnoyu-urazheno-ponad-20-pryrodoohoronnyh-terytorij-ukrayiny
Збитки заповідному фонду та біорізноманіттю України від війни становлять орієнтовно понад 600 млрд грн. Міністерство захисту довкілля та природних ресурсів України. 02.08.2024. URL: https://mepr.gov.ua/zbytky-zapovidnomu-fondu-ta-bioriznomanittyu-ukrayiny-vid-vijny-stanovlyat-oriyentovno-ponad-600-mlrd-grn-vzhe-zaraz-potribno-napratsovuvaty-kroky-po-jogo-vidnovlennyu
Міністерство захисту довкілля та природних ресурсів України. Набір даних державного кадастру територій та об’єктів природно-заповідного фонду України. URL: https://data.gov.ua/dataset/mepr_05
Flyr M., Koontz L. 2023 national park visitor spending effects: Economic contributions to local communities, states, and the nation. Science Report. NPS/SR—2024/174. Fort Collins, Colorado: National Park Service; 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36967/2305351
Mayer M., et al. The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2010; 97(2):73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.013
Cairngorms National Park. Park Authority’s tourism economic impact report reflects emergence of off-peak growth. 17.10.2024. URL: https://cairngorms.co.uk/news/park-authoritys-tourism-economic-impact-report-reflects-emergence-of-off-peak-growth
Портал «Природа України». Природно-заповідний фонд України. Національні природні парки. URL: https://pzf.land.kiev.ua/pzf3.html
Портал відкритих даних «Опендатабот». URL: https://opendatabot.ua
Seheda, I. V. (2013). Methodical approaches to the assessment of natural resources to ensure the rational use of natural-resource complexes. Bulletin of Donetsk National University. Series B: Economics and Law, 2. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ru&user=cTob-AwAAAAJ&citation_for_view=cTob-AwAAAAJ:maZDTaKrznsC
Soloviy, I. P., & Burda, Y. A. (2022). Methodological features of ecosystem services assessment in forest ecosystems within protected areas. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 32(3), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.36930/40320306
Hetman, V. I. (2007). Landscape diversity of protected landscapes: Assessment criteria. Scientific Notes. Biology and Ecology, 67, 44–49. Retrieved from https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/
Rudenko, L. G., Holubtsov, O. G., Chekhnii, V. M., Maruniak, Ye. O., & Lisovskyi, S. A. (2020). Methodology and practice of assessing the territory of Ukraine for conservation: Monograph. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. Retrieved from https://igu.org.ua/node/171
Pisani, D., Pazienza, P., Perrino, E. V., Caporale, D., & De Lucia, C. (2021). The economic valuation of ecosystem services of biodiversity components in protected areas: A review for a framework of analysis for the Gargano National Park. Sustainability, 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111726
Hummel, C., Poursanidis, D., Orenstein, D., Elliott, M., Adamescu, M. C., Cazacu, C., Ziv, G., Chrysoulakis, N., van der Meer, J., & Hummel, H. (2019). Protected area management: Fusion and confusion with the ecosystem services approach. Science of the Total Environment, 651(Part 2), 2432–2443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.033
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://iucn.org/
Living Planet. (2025, February 9). Sustainable development of the nature reserve fund of Ukraine: Challenges, international cooperation and prospects. Retrieved from https://livingplanet.org.ua/novuny/stalij-rozvitok-prirodno-zapovidnogo-fondu-ukrajini-vikliki-mizhnarodna-spivpratsya-ta-perspektivi
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2023, November 6). More than 20% of Ukraine’s protected areas are affected by war. Retrieved from https://mepr.gov.ua/vijnoyu-urazheno-ponad-20-pryrodoohoronnyh-terytorij-ukrayiny
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2024, August 2). Damage to the nature reserve fund and biodiversity of Ukraine from the war is estimated at over UAH 600 billion. Retrieved from https://mepr.gov.ua/zbytky-zapovidnomu-fondu-ta-bioriznomanittyu-ukrayiny-vid-vijny-stanovlyat-oriyentovno-ponad-600-mlrd-grn-vzhe-zaraz-potribno-napratsovuvaty-kroky-po-jogo-vidnovlennyu
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (n.d.). Dataset of the state cadastre of territories and objects of the nature reserve fund of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://data.gov.ua/dataset/mepr_05
Flyr, M., & Koontz, L. (2024). 2023 national park visitor spending effects: Economic contributions to local communities, states, and the nation. Science Report NPS/SR—2024/174. National Park Service. Fort Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.36967/2305351
Mayer, M., Müller, M., Woltering, M., Arnegger, J., & Job, H. (2010). The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.013
Cairngorms National Park Authority. (2024, October 17). Park Authority’s tourism economic impact report reflects emergence of off-peak growth. Retrieved from https://cairngorms.co.uk/news/park-authoritys-tourism-economic-impact-report-reflects-emergence-of-off-peak-growth
Nature of Ukraine portal. (n.d.). Nature reserve fund of Ukraine: National natural parks. Retrieved from https://pzf.land.kiev.ua/pzf3.html
Opendatabot. (n.d.). Open data portal. Retrieved from https://opendatabot.ua
Copyright (c) 2025 Олександра Воробйова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
