THE ESSENCE, PRINCIPLES AND TARGET ORIENTATION OF AGRICULTURE EXTENSION SERVICES
Abstract
The article reveals the essence and evolution of agricultural extension as a key institution of the global agricultural sector, which is a necessary basis for determining the principles and target orientation of agricultural extension services. The purpose of the publication is to study the essence, principles and target orientation of extension services in the context of modern transformation processes. The author emphasizes the leading role of agricultural extension in ensuring sustainable rural development, its significant contribution to improving the welfare and efficiency of small agricultural enterprises. The historical origins of modern agricultural extension, dating back to the Green Revolution and its focus on the large-scale dissemination of agrotechnical knowledge to ensure food security in the postwar period, are considered. The traditional model of agricultural extension, based on the one-way transfer of knowledge from expert advisers to agricultural producers, is analyzed and its limitations related to the ignoring of socio-political aspects of agricultural production are identified. The paradigm shift in the evolution of extension services from the technocratic model to the formation of agricultural extension services based on the principles of dialogue, individualization and comprehensiveness, taking into account the socio-political context and human potential, is substantiated. Attention is focused on the significant increase in scientific interest in the problems of agricultural extension at the beginning of the new millennium, which is confirmed by the exponential increase in scientific publications in specialized publications. It is emphasized that modern extension is a dynamic and evolving system. It is noted that the current stage of extension development requires the integration of socio-political dimensions to ensure sustainable rural development. The relevance of agricultural extension in the context of modern transformations and the growing importance of sustainable rural development is proved. Prospects for further research include studying the world experience of organizing advisory activities and determining the prospects for its implementation in Ukraine.
References
Грановська В., Кононенко Л., Савченко В. Функціонування дорадчих служб у контексті забезпечення сталого сільського розвитку. Економіка та суспільство, 2024. (69). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-69-111
Євчу С. А. Інституціональна сутність системи сільськогосподарського дорадництва в Україні. Інноваційна економіка, 2024, (1), 76-83. 10.37332/2309-1533.2024.1.9
Кирилов Ю.Є., Грановська В.Г., Кононенко Л.В. Агроконсалтинг як інструмент забезпечення реалізації сталого сільського розвитку. Економічний простір. 2024. № 193. С. 102-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.193.102-108
Коваль Н. В. Сільськогосподарське дорадництво в Україні: сутність, проблеми та перспективи розвитку. Агросвіт. 2022. № 21. С. 36-43. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2022.21.36
Савченко В., Кононенко Л. Оптимізація функціонування малих сільськогосподарських підприємств у контексті співпраці з регіональними дорадчими службами. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Економіка, 2022, (14), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2022.14.6
Anderson J. R., Feder G. Agricultural extension. Handbook of agricultural economics, 2007, 3, 2343-2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1
Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, R. E., Feder, G. The economic impact of agricultural extension: A review. Economic development and cultural change, 1991, 39(3), 607-650. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/451893
Chambers R., Ghildyal B. P. Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: the farmer-first-and-last model. Agricultural administration, 1985, 20(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(85)90063-9
Cook B. R., Satizabal P., Curnow J. Humanising agricultural extension: A review. World Development, 2021, 140, 105337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105337
Malthus T. An essay on the principle of population. In British Politics And The Environment In The Long Nineteenth Century, 2023. (pp. 77-84). Routledge.
Pingali P. L. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,2012. 109(31), 12302-12308. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091295310
Hranovska, V., Kononenko, L., & Savchenko, V. (2024). Funktsionuvannia doradchykh sluzhb u konteksti zabezpechennia staloho silskoho rozvytku [Functioning of advisory services in the context of sustainable rural development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo - Economy and Society, (69). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-69-111
Ievchu, S. A. (2024). Instytutsionalna sutnist systemy silskohospodarskoho doradnytstva v Ukraini [Institutional essence of the agricultural advisory system in Ukraine]. Innovatsiina ekonomika - Innovative Economy, (1), 76-83. 10.37332/2309-1533.2024.1.9
Kyrylov Yu.Ie., Hranovska V.H. & Kononenko L.V. (2024). Ahrokonsaltynh yak instrument zabezpechennia realizatsii staloho silskoho rozvytku [Agricultural consulting as a tool for ensuring the implementation of sustainable rural development]. Ekonomichnyi prostir - Economic space. Vol. 193, pp. 102-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.193.102-108
Koval N. V. (2022). Silskohospodarske doradnytstvo v Ukraini: sutnist, problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Agricultural advisory services in Ukraine: essence, problems and prospects of development]. Ahrosvit - Agrosvit. № 21. S. 36-43. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2022.21.36
Savchenko, V., & Kononenko, L. (2022). Optymizatsiia funktsionuvannia malykh silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv u konteksti spivpratsi z rehionalnymy doradchymy sluzhbamy [Optimization of the functioning of small agricultural enterprises in the context of cooperation with regional advisory services]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika - Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Economics, (14), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2022.14.6
Anderson, J. R., & Feder, G. (2007). Agricultural extension. Handbook of agricultural economics, 3, 2343-2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1
Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, R. E., & Feder, G. (1991). The economic impact of agricultural extension: A review. Economic development and cultural change, 39(3), 607-650. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/451893
Chambers, R., & Ghildyal, B. P. (1985). Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: the farmer-first-and-last model. Agricultural administration, 20(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(85)90063-9
Cook, B. R., Satizabal, P., & Curnow, J. (2021). Humanising agricultural extension: A review. World Development, 140, 105337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105337
Malthus, T. (2023). An essay on the principle of population. In British Politics And The Environment In The Long Nineteenth Century (pp. 77-84). Routledge.
Pingali, P. L. (2012). Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(31), 12302-12308. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091295310

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.