BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE POST-WAR DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE AND INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISES

Keywords: post-war enterprise development, principles of post-war development, marginal profit, behavioural economics, industry 5.0, economic security, economic potential

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the urgent issue of post-war recovery and development of Ukraine's economy. The relevance of this issue is linked to historical peculiarities and inefficiencies in the overall economy and individual enterprises, as well as the lack of close and modern historical analogies of the post-war recovery of other countries. The absence of historical experience became the basis for the chosen goal of the work – to form a basic list of principles for post-war development, considering the current limitations of the state and individual enterprises with the effective achievements of social and economic sciences. The research is based on the study of the works of Ukrainian and foreign authors in terms of approaches to effective post-war development; development in general and in comparison with the historical experience of post-war development of other countries. Through induction and deduction of the obtained information, an expert method was used to form and propose a basic, inexhaustible list of principles for post-war development aimed at revolutionary transformations. The result of the study was the formation of a list of eight principles of post-war development applicable at the state level or to individual enterprises. The list is not exhaustive, but it combines principles that will allow for the transformation of the approaches of inefficient historical traditions of state management or the review of the development strategies of individual enterprises, which will help reduce operational risks and shorten post-war development periods to the level of developed countries. Another result was the systematization of modern and effective management tools, united within the listed principles, which are important in understanding the paradigm of further transformations and development. The practical result of the work is a basic list of principles for analysing and choosing further development directions. In the long term, this will increase the efficiency of state management, reduce the burden on enterprise analytical departments, and shorten decision-making time. Another consequence of the work is that it is expected to create a foundation for further development and discussions on practical tools for post-war recovery and development.

References

Лозова О., Тимошенко І. Проактивна поведінка вітчизняних підприємств у повоєнний період. ECONOMICS: time realities. 2023. №1 (65). с. 41-48. DOI: https://doі.org/ 10.15276/ETR.01.2023.5

Манн Р., Махно С. Інноваційно-інвестиційний потенціал підприємств України: умови збереження та розвитку в повоєнний період. Економічний простір. 2022. №182. с. 144-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/182-23

Нагара М. Прогресивні бізнес-моделі: домінування цінностей індустрії 5.0. Економіка та суспільство. 2022. №45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-38

Ривак Н. Індустрія 5.0: перехід до стійкої та орієнтованої на людину промисловості. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України. 2022. №155 (3). с. 41-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2022-3-7

Ємець В. Економічний розвиток у повоєнний період в Україні: загальні аспекти. Інвестиції: практика та досвід. 2022. № 7-8. с. 51-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2022.7-8.51

Самофатова В. Забезпечення сталості та інклюзивності розвитку малого та середнього підприємництва в повоєнний період. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. №53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-53-3

Політика визначає економіку. Forbes Україна. 2024-2025. №6(33). с. 159-163.

Lozova O., Tymoshenko I. (2023) Proaktyvna povedinka vitchyznianykh pidpryiemstv u povoiennyi period [Proactive behavior of domestic enterprises in the post-war period]. ECONOMICS: time realities. no. 1 (65). pp. 41-48. DOI: https://doі.org/ 10.15276/ETR.01.2023.5 (in Ukrainian)

Mann R., Makhno S. (2022) Innovatsiino-investytsiinyi potentsial pidpryiemstv Ukrainy: umovy zberezhynnia ta rozvytku v povoiennyi period [Innovation and investment potential of ukrainian enterprises: conditions of preservation and development in the post-war period]. Ekonomichnyi prostir. no. 182. Pp. 144-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/182-23 (in Ukrainian)

Nahara M. (2022). Prohresyvni biznes-modeli: dominuvannia tsinostei industrii 5.0 [Progressive business models: dominating the values of industry 5.0]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. no. 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-38 (in Ukrainian)

Ryvak N. (2022). Industriya 5.0: perekhid do stiykoyi ta oriyentovanoyi na lyudynu promyslovosti [Industry 5.0: transition to a sustainable and human-oriented industry]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny. no. 155 (3). pp. 41-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2022-3-7 (in Ukrainian)

Yemets V. (2022). Ekonomichnyi rozvytok u povoiennyi period v Ukraini: zahalni aspekty [Economic development in the post-war period in Ukraine: general aspects]. Investytsii: praktyka I dosvid. no. 7-8. pp. 51-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2022.7-8.51 (in Ukrainian)

Samofatova V. (2023). Zabezpechennia stalosti ta inkliuzyvnosti rozvytku maloho ta serednoho pidpryiemnytstva v povoiennii period [Ensuring sustainability and inclusiveness of the development of small and medium-sized enterprises in the post-war period]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. no. 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-53-3 (in Ukrainian)

Polityka vyznachaie ekonomiku [Politics determines the economy] (2024-2025). Forbes Ukraine. no. 6(33). P. 159-163. (in Ukrainian)

Article views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Namiasenko, V. (2024). BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE POST-WAR DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE AND INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISES. Economy and Society, (70). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-160
Section
ECONOMICS