CONTRADICTIONS OF THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT METHOD AND SUSTAINABILITY FORMATION PERIODS OF ORGANIZATIONS FUNCTIONING
Abstract
The paper's purpose is to identify contradictions and prospects of the assessing method and stability formation periods of organizations for further research and improvement based on reviewing of the conditions use. To solve the tasks in the work were used the method of system approach, the method of analysis and synthesis, the method of structural analysis and design of systems, grouping, generalization. The formulation and solution of the scientific-applied problem of the analysis and revealing of contradictions of assessing method and stability formation periods of organizations function by E.M. Korotkov. The classification of the levels of transients and the mathematical model for calculating the coefficients of adaptation and synergy to determine the compliance of the level of transients in the organization are analyzed. The classification of the levels of transients and the mathematical model for calculating the coefficients of adaptation and synergy to determine the compliance of the level of transients in the organization are analyzed. Based on the graphical analysis, three contradictions were revealed. 1. The homeostatic level on the graph in the case of a turning point has the form of a point, and the transformation period – a line that can not reflect the period, characterize the state of the organization and give reliable results. It is proposed to introduce an interval that takes into account the deviation associated with various factors and the probabilistic nature of the assessment of socio-economic systems. 2. Inconsistency (coherence) of the model, which is associated with inconsistency and inadequacy of the breakdown of the area of indicators between homogeneous coefficients of adaptation and synergy. 3. In the graphical representation there are no "stable" (stable, quasi-stable) and "unstable" (quasi-transient) states and, accordingly, their coefficients of adaptation and synergy, and therefore half of the areas are not defined. The reliability and accuracy of the evaluation results by this method are questionable. The identified contradictions need further research and resolution, based on which the prospects for further research are formed. The developed approaches can be used to improve the procedure of crisis management and the formation of organizations' stability in any sector of the economy. The article may be of interest to senior managers and project managers.
References
Коротков Э.М. Антикризисное управление : учеб. пособие. Москва : ИНФРА-М, 2003. С. 432.
Молоканова В.М. Аналіз синергетичних аспектів адаптації організації до змін зовнішнього середовища через портфель проектів. Восточно-Европейский журнал передовых технологий. 2015. № 5(3). С. 4–10.
Molokanova V. M., Hordieieva I. O. Study of the organization adaptivity rate correlation in relation to its internal integrity. Scientific journal herald of advanced information technology. 2020. Vol. 3. №.4. рр. 292–304. doi: 10.15276/hait.04.2020.7.
Левкин Н.В. Современные тенденции управления культурой в системе предпринимательства. Петрозаводск : ПетрГУ, 2009. С. 342.
Букреев А.М., Дударев О.Е., Зубкова Н.В. Системологический подход к управлению организацией в кризисных условиях. Организатор производства. 2007. № 1. С. 30–33.
Дзюбан С.В. Антикризисное управление коммерческими банками в условиях реструктуризации банковской системы : дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.10. Оренбург, 2003. 192 c.
Погорелова Л.А. Формирование непрерывных инновационных процессов на предприятиях в условиях становления цифровой экономики : дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. Москва, 2019,176 с.
Туников В.А. Организационно-экономическое обеспечение устойчивого развития машиностроительного предприятия : дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. Новочеркасск. 2002, 230 с.
Хальфин Р.М. Механизмы и методы корпоративного контроля в процессе закупок материально-технических ресурсов : дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. Москва, 2018, 159 с.
Соловьев Ю.Ю. Формирование стратегии устойчивого экономического развития газохимических предприятий : автореф. дис. … канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. Астрахань, 2007, 24 с.
Патласов О.Ю., Сергиенко О.В. Антикризисное управление. Финансовое моделирование и диагностика банкротства коммерческой организации. Москва : Книжный мир, 2009. С. 512.
Джуха В.М., Сааков А.С. Системная стабилизация в антикризисном управлении как средство предотвращения банкротства. Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. 2014. № 12 (72). URL: http://uecs.ru/uecs-72-722014/item/3233-2014-12-16-08-03-55.
Лунев В.Л. Тактика и стратегия управления фирмой: учебное пособие. Москва : Финпресс, 1997. С. 356.
Малышенко А.М. Математические основы теории систем: учеб. для вузов. Томск : Томский политехнический университет, 2008. С. 364.
Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement JCGM 100: 2008 GUM 1995 with minor corrections, 2008. 134 p.
Сергеев А.Г., Латышев М.В., Терегеря В.В. Метрология, стандартизация, сертификация: учеб. пособие. Москва : Логос, 2003. С. 536.
Korotkov E.M. (2003). Antikrizisnoe upravlenie: ucheb. posobie [Crisis Management: A Study Guide]. Moskva: INFRA-M [in Russian].
Molokanova V.M. (2015). Analiz synerhetychnykh aspektiv adaptatsii orhanizatsii do zmin zovnishnoho seredovyshcha cherez portfel proektiv [Analysis of synergetic aspects of the organization's adaptation to changes in the external environment through a portfolio of projects]. Vostochno-Evropeyskiy zhurnal peredovyih tehnologiy – Eastern European Journal of Advanced Technologies, 5(3), 4–10 [in Ukrainian].
Molokanova V.M., Hordieieva I.O. (2020). Study of the organization adaptivity rate correlation in relation to its internal integrity. Scientific journal herald of advanced information technology, 3(4), 292–304. doi: 10.15276/hait.04.2020.7.
Levkin N.V. (2009). Sovremennyie tendentsii upravleniya kulturoy v sisteme predprinimatelstva [Modern trends in culture management in the system of entrepreneurship]. Petrozavodsk: PetrGU [in Russian].
Bukreev A.M., Dudarev O.E., Zubkova N.V. (2007). Sistemologicheskiy podhod k upravleniyu organizatsiey v krizisnyih usloviyah [Systemological approach to managing an organization in crisis conditions]. Organizator proizvodstva – Production organizer, 1, 30–33 [in Russian].
Dzyuban S.V. (2003). Antikrizisnoe upravlenie kommercheskimi bankami v usloviyah restrukturizatsii bankovskoy sistemyi [Anti-crisis management of commercial banks in the context of banking system restructuring] Candidate’s thesis. Orenburg [in Russian].
Pogorelova L.A. (2019). Formirovanie nepreryivnyih innovatsionnyih protsessov na predpriyatiyah v usloviyah stanovleniya tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Formation of continuous innovation processes at enterprises in the context of the formation of the digital economy]. Candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian].
Tunikov V.A. (2002). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoe obespechenie ustoychivogo razvitiya mashinostroitelnogo predpriyatiya [Organizational and economic support for the sustainable development of a machine-building enterprise]. Candidate’s thesis. Novocherkassk [in Russian].
Halfin R.M. (2018). Mehanizmyi i metodyi korporativnogo kontrolya v protsesse zakupok materialno-tehnicheskih resursov [Mechanisms and methods of corporate control in the procurement of material and technical resources]. Candidate’s thesis. Moskva [in Russian].
Solovev Yu.Yu. (2007) Formirovanie strategii ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya gazohimicheskih predpriyatiy [Formation of a strategy for sustainable economic development of gas chemical enterprises]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Astrahan [in Russian].
Patlasov O.Yu., Sergienko O.V. (2009). Antikrizisnoe upravlenie. Finansovoe modelirovanie i diagnostika bankrotstva kommercheskoy organizatsii [Crisis management. Financial modeling and diagnostics of the bankruptcy of a commercial organization]. Moskva: Knizhnyiy mir [in Russian].
Dzhuha V.M., Saakov A.S. (2014). Sistemnaya stabilizatsiya v antikrizisnom upravlenii kak sredstvo predotvrascheniya bankrotstva [Systemic stabilization in anti-crisis management as a means of preventing bankruptcy]. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami – Economic systems management, 12 (72). [in Russian].
Lunev V.L. (1997). Taktika i strategiya upravleniya firmoy: uchebnoe posobie [Firm management tactics and strategy: a tutorial]. Moskva: Finpress [in Russian].
Malyishenko A.M. (2008). Matematicheskie osnovyi teorii sistem: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Mathematical foundations of systems theory: a textbook for universities]. Tomsk: Tomskiy politehnicheskiy universitet [in Russian].
Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement JCGM 100: 2008 GUM 1995 with minor corrections, 2008. 134 p.
Sergeyev A.G., Latyshev M.V., Teregerya V.V. (2003). Metrologiya, standartizatsiya, sertifikatsiya: uchebnoe posobie [Metrology, standardization, certification: textbook]. Moskva: Logos [in Russian].
