TAX INSTRUMENTS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article deals with revealing the essence of the tax instruments ensuring sustainable economic development. The role of the aforementioned policy’s tax component in the sustainable economic growth regulation was identified. Both theoretical and methodological statements on the tax policy preparation and implementation as an institutional mechanism influencing social and economic processes have been systematized and deepened. It was proved that an optimal set of tax regulation measures could catalyze economic growth and contribute to the realization of the stakeholders interests’ realization. The principles and approaches to the tax policy’s implementation were substantiated. It was pointed out that tax policy should be stable, balanced, scientifically justified and predictable, ensuring harmonization between general public interests and individual activity of the economic agents, preventing social gaps and unfair property stratification. Social justice was considered as one of the main tax policy’s implementation principles, aimed at evaluation of the taxpayers’ actual financials capacity. The peculiarities of the tax policy’s implementation in the European Union member-countries were analyzed. The differentiation in the above states’ tax burden levels over the period from 2014 to 2023 was highlighted. The transformation practices of tax regulation were regarded. It was proved that a decrease in tax burden could be associated with business reactivation and recultivation. Meanwhile, economic liberalization should not be considered as a panacea for economic development. It was specifically mentioned that GDP redistribution throughout public finances might ensure economic sustainability, creating the supportive conditions for the population’s economic activity and social welfare. A prudent balance between the tax system’s profile and the social services’ quality and accessibility for the potential consumers should be found to eliminate the negative effects of market competition. A model for social and economic development tax regulation was proposed.
References
Baiardi, D., Profeta, P., Puglisi, R., & Scabrosetti, S. (2019). Tax policy and economic growth: does it really matter? International tax and public finance, 26, 282–316.
Aydin, C., & Esen, Ö. (2019). Optimal tax revenues and economic growth in transition economies: a threshold regression approach. Global Business and Economics Review, 21(2), 246–265.
Acosta-Ormaechea, S., Sola, S., & Yoo, J. (2019). Tax composition and growth: A broad cross-country perspective. German Economic Review, 20(4), e70-e106.
Ferraro, D., Ghazi, S., & Peretto, P. F. (2020). Implications of tax policy for innovation and aggregate productivity growth. European Economic Review, 130, 103590.
Stoilova, D., & Todorov, I. (2021). Fiscal policy and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Tax Reform, 7(2), 146–159.
Gross, T., & Klein, P. (2022). Optimal tax policy and endogenous growth through innovation. Journal of Public Economics, 209, 104645.
Бюджетно-податкова політика у системі регулювання економіки : монографія / за заг. ред. І. Я. Чугунова. Київ : Глобус-Пресс, 2018. 350 с.
Pasichnyi, M., Kaneva, T., Ruban, M., Nepytaliuk, A. (2019). The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic development. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(3), 29–39.
Kaneva, T., Chugunov, I., Pasichnyi, M., Nikitishin A., & Husarevych, N. (2022). Tax policy for economic recovery and sustainable development after COVID–19. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2), 102–109.
Chugunov, I., Makohon, V., Kaneva, T., & Adamenko, I. (2022). Influence of financial support of human capital development on economic growth. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 269–280.
Sidelnykova, L., Ovsiuk, N., Savastieieva, O., Kozak, S., Lishchuk, N., & Zinchenko, A. (2022). Tax Incentives in the System of State Financial Support of Economic Entities. Economic Affairs, 67(4), 653–659.
Pasichnyi, М. (2024). Fiscal dominants of military financing. Scientia fructuosa, 2, 20–37.
Dobrovolska, O., Günther, S., Chernetska, O., Dubrova, N., & Kachula, S. (2024). Environmentally related taxes and their influence on decarbonization of the economy. Environmental Economics, 15(1), 174–189.
Козловський С. В., Мазур, Г. Ф., Непиталюк А. В. Демографічна стійкість суспільства як основа економічного розвитку. Економіка та держава. 2019. № 10. С. 14–19.
Ricardo, D. (2005). From the principles of political economy and taxation. In Readings in the economics of the division of labor: The classical tradition (pp. 127–130).
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of political economy, 98(5, Part 2), 103–125.
The European Commission Database. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
Непиталюк А. В. Детермінанти забезпечення демографічної стійкості. Зовнішня торгівля: економіка, фінанси, право. 2019. № 105(4). С. 44–59.
Пасічний М. Д., Непиталюк А. В. Інновації та конкурентоспроможність як домінанти економічного зростання. Бізнес Інформ. 2023. №10. C. 102–111.
Baiardi, D., Profeta, P., Puglisi, R., & Scabrosetti, S. (2019). Tax policy and economic growth: does it really matter? International tax and public finance, 26, 282–316. (in English)
Aydin, C., & Esen, Ö. (2019). Optimal tax revenues and economic growth in transition economies: a threshold regression approach. Global Business and Economics Review, 21(2), 246–265. (in English)
Acosta-Ormaechea, S., Sola, S., & Yoo, J. (2019). Tax composition and growth: A broad cross-country perspective. German Economic Review, 20(4), e70-e106. (in English)
Ferraro, D., Ghazi, S., & Peretto, P. F. (2020). Implications of tax policy for innovation and aggregate productivity growth. European Economic Review, 130, 103590. (in English)
Stoilova, D., & Todorov, I. (2021). Fiscal policy and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Tax Reform, 7(2), 146–159. (in English)
Gross, T., & Klein, P. (2022). Optimal tax policy and endogenous growth through innovation. Journal of Public Economics, 209, 104645. (in English)
Biudzhetno-podatkova polityka u systemi rehuliuvannia ekonomiky [Fiscal policy in the system of economic regulation] monohrafiia [a monograph]. (2018) Kyiv: Hlobus-Press. 350 p. (in Ukrainian)
Pasichnyi, M., Kaneva, T., Ruban, M., Nepytaliuk, A. (2019). The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic development. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(3), 29–39. (in English)
Kaneva, T., Chugunov, I., Pasichnyi, M., Nikitishin A., & Husarevych, N. (2022). Tax policy for economic recovery and sustainable development after COVID–19. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2), 102–109. (in English)
Chugunov, I., Makohon, V., Kaneva, T., & Adamenko, I. (2022). Influence of financial support of human capital development on economic growth. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 269–280. (in English)
Sidelnykova, L., Ovsiuk, N., Savastieieva, O., Kozak, S., Lishchuk, N., & Zinchenko, A. (2022). Tax Incentives in the System of State Financial Support of Economic Entities. Economic Affairs, 67(4), 653–659. (in English)
Pasichnyi, М. (2024). Fiscal dominants of military financing. Scientia fructuosa, 2, 20–37. (in English)
Dobrovolska, O., Günther, S., Chernetska, O., Dubrova, N., & Kachula, S. (2024). Environmentally related taxes and their influence on decarbonization of the economy. Environmental Economics, 15(1), 174–189. (in English)
Kozlovskyi, S. V., Mazur, G. F., Nepytaliuk, A. V. (2019). Demohrafichna stiikist suspilstva yak osnova ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Demographic sustainability as the basis for economic development]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, no 10, pp. 14–19. (in Ukrainian)
Ricardo, D. (2005). From the principles of political economy and taxation. In Readings in the economics of the division of labor: The classical tradition (pp. 127–130). (in English)
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of political economy, 98(5, Part 2), 103–125.
The European Commission Database. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
Nepytaliuk, A. V. (2019). Determinanty zabezpechennia demohrafichnoi stiikosti [Determinants for the demographic sustainability ensuring]. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo – Foreign trade: economics, finance, law, no 105(4), pp. 44–59. (in Ukrainian)
Pasichnyi, М. V., Nepytaliuk, A. V. (2023) Innovatsii ta konkurentospromozhnist yak dominanty ekonomichnoho zrostannia [Innovations and Competitiveness as Dominants of Economic Growth]. Business Inform – Biznes Inform, no. 10, pp. 102–111. (in Ukrainian)
