AGILE FOR CROSS-NATIONAL IT PROJECTS: PRODUCTIVITY AND RISKS

Keywords: Agile, international IT projects, cultural differences, language barriers, project efficiency, project riskiness, intercultural training, multilingual communication platforms

Abstract

This article examines the impact of Agile methodology on the productivity of international IT projects and analyzes the associated risks in a multinational environment. The importance of addressing cultural differences and language barriers for the successful implementation of Agile is substantiated. The study proposes an adaptive model that includes several key components: regular intercultural training for all project participants, multilingual communication platforms, and standardization of communication and project management processes. The model suggests that intercultural training helps team members understand and appreciate the cultural specifics of their colleagues, improving interaction and reducing misunderstandings. Multilingual communication platforms are critical for ensuring effective communication in international teams, reducing the impact of language barriers. The standardization of communication processes and project management helps ensure consistency in the team's work, reducing the risk of misunderstandings and improving overall coordination. The study further evaluates the effectiveness and riskiness of the proposed solutions using specific formulas: the Project Efficiency (PE) formula and the Project Risk Index (RI) formula. The results show that the implementation of these solutions significantly improves project efficiency and reduces risks. For instance, without the proposed solutions, the project efficiency (PE) is lower, and the risk index (RI) is higher, indicating more significant challenges and potential failures. With the implementation of the proposed measures, project efficiency improves, and the risk index decreases, demonstrating the benefits of these strategies. Additionally, the study highlights the critical role of leadership competencies in implementing and adapting Agile methods in international teams. It proposes several approaches for developing these competencies, including coaching and mentoring programs, and creating an environment for open dialogue where all team members can express their ideas and suggestions freely. These initiatives enhance professional development, increase trust and cooperation within the team, and contribute to the overall success of the project. In conclusion, the study underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to effectively implement Agile in international IT projects. This approach includes intercultural training, the use of modern communication technologies, process standardization, and the development of leadership competencies. The prospects for further research lie in identifying new mechanisms and directions for developing these approaches to enhance the management of international teams further.

References

Ghimire, D., & Charters, S. (2022). The Impact of Agile Development Practices on Project Outcomes. Software, 1(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.3390/software1030012

Impact of agile management on project performance: Evidence from I.T sector of Pakistan. (2023). PLOS ONE. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230733

A systematic review of Agile methodologies in software development. (2021). IACIS. Retrieved from https://iacis.org/iis/2021/3_iis_2021_298-316.pdf

Exploring the challenges and benefits for scaling agile project management in large projects. (2023). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/springer_12345678

Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute, Inc.

Hillson, D. (2009). Managing Risk in Projects. Gower Publishing, Ltd.

Article views: 29
PDF Downloads: 16
Published
2024-05-27
How to Cite
Druhov, O., & Terzian, R. (2024). AGILE FOR CROSS-NATIONAL IT PROJECTS: PRODUCTIVITY AND RISKS. Economy and Society, (63). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-63-17
Section
MANAGEMENT