INSTITUTIONAL DOMINANCE OF ADAPTATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION SOCIETY IN UKRAINE
Abstract
The development of digitization processes has actualized the problem of inadequacy of the provisions of classical theories of rational behavior of economic subjects to real economic processes. Currently, the attention of specialists is focused on the study of the reflexive and active environment of entrepreneurship as a set of conditions and external factors that affect the possibilities and final results of the activities of the subjects of market relations and allow the realization of the corresponding goals and functions, taking into account psychological characteristics and acquired competencies. The purpose of the work is to study the main dominant factor in the adaptation of business process management to the conditions of the development of the information society of the economy, which is the institutional component of the reflexive and active environment of entrepreneurship. The work uses general scientific methods of research, in particular, theoretical - systemic, generalization, classification and explanation. The constituent parts of the reflexive and active environment of entrepreneurship are determined: information and communication; institutional; tools of the digital economy, which are classified by both functions and technologies. The steps of the Government regarding the transformation of the institutional component to the conditions of development of the information society of the economy of Ukraine have been studied. It was revealed that the main tasks of the approved plan for the digitalization of business processes of enterprises have not been fulfilled, namely: development of "road maps" of digital transformations and models of digital development of basic and promising industries of Ukraine, industrial and production digital platforms; development and modernization of industry and production based on Industry 4.0 technologies. The probability of progression of the country's technological backwardness is substantiated. Recommendations have been developed for improving the institutional component of the reflexive and active environment of entrepreneurship for the purpose of digital transformation and adaptation of business process management of domestic entrepreneurial structures. This direction of research opens up new prospects for the development of theoretical and empirical studies of the digital economy and entrepreneurship, in particular, in the field of business development management in the conditions of the development of the information society.
References
Лепа Р.М., Мадих А.А. Перспективи використання рефлексивного підходу в економіці. Економіка: реалії часу. Науковий журнал. 2011. № 1 (1). С. 17-20.
Simon J. Cognitive Limits on Rationality. March. New York: McGrow-Hill, 1958. 270 p.
Димченко Н.С. Рефлексивне управління та його роль в управлінській діяльності. Економічні науки. Серія “Економіка та менеджмент”: Збірник наукових праць. Луцький національний технічний університет. 10 (38). 2013. С. 55-66;
Калінеску Т. В., Шведчиков О. А. Забезпечення сталого розвитку промислових підприємств з використанням рефлексивного підходу. Інноваційна економіка. 2013. № 1. С. 73-77.
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W W Norton & Co.
Адаптація управління бізнес-процесами в умовах цифровізації економіки: теоретичний аспект / [Уманець Т.В., Шлафман Н.Л., Даниліна С.О. та ін.] ; за заг. ред. Уманець Т.В. ; НАН України, ДУ «Інститут ринку і економіко-екологічних досліджень НАН України». Одеса : ДУ ІРЕЕД НАНУ, 2022. 380 с.
Економіка і планування бізнесу. Наукове видання / Наукові ред.: д.е.н., проф. Кучеренко В.Р., д.е.н., проф. Бутенко А.І. Одеса, 2004. 458 с.
Tsiavos, Vasilis & Kitsios, Fotis. (2022). Technology as Driver, Enabler and Barrier of Digital Transformation: A Review.
Chen, P.; Yan, Z.; Wang, P. (2023) How can the Digital Economy Boost the Performance of Entrepreneurs? A Large Sample of Evidence from China’s Business Incubators. Sustainability. 15, 5789.
Aulia, Zahara & Meinasya, Aulia. (2022). Analysis of E-Commerce Utilization in MSME (Micro Small and Medium Enterprises). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365172361_Analysis_of_ECommerce_Utilization_in_MSME_Micro_Small_and_Medium_Enterprises; Olapade, Susan & Lin, Zhi & Qin, Yupei & Xue, Yuan & Ni, Chenkai. (2023). E-Commerce in the Post-Pandemic Era: The Role of Innovative Technology.
Peter, Marc & Baumgartner, Reto & Lindeque, Johan & Rozumowski, Anna & Siscaro, Danilo & Binnendijk, Valentin & Gasser, Marc. (2023). E-Commerce Automation Report 2023: Einleitung, Studienresultate und Workshop-Canvas E-Commerce Automation.
Ištvanić, Marin & Milić, Dominika & Krpic, Zdravko. (2017). Digital Marketing in the Business Environment. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems. 8. 67-75.
Santos Jaen, Jose Manuel & Gimeno-Arias, Fernando & León-Gómez, Ana & Palacios Manzano, Mercedes. (2023). The Business Digitalization Process in SMEs from the Implementation of e-Commerce: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research. 18. 1700-1720.
H V, Mukesh. (2022). Digital Transformation Taking Centre Stage: How Is Digital Transformation Reshaping Entrepreneurial Innovation?. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 31.
Wang, Shuai & Ahmad, Fayyaz & Li, Yanlong & Abid, Nabila & Chandio, Abbas & Rehman, Abdul. (2022). The Impact of Industrial Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability. 14. 4520.
Shlafman, N., Bondarenko, O., & Zakcharov, O. (2020). Modern theoretical foundations of formation of the market of innovative technologies in the context of the concept of neoindustrialization. Economic Innovations, 22(1(74), 165-178.
Online Platforms: How to Adapt Regulatory Framework to the Digital Age? Policy Department A: Economy and Scientific Policy European Parliament PE 607.323. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/ 607323/ IPOL_BRI(2017)607323_EN.pdf
De Streel, A., B. Liebhaberg, A. Fletcher, R. Feasey, J. Krämer, and G. Monti (2021) ‘The European Proposal for A Digital Markets Act: A First Assessment’. Centre on Regulation in Europe, 19 January. Available at 15 July 2021. https://cerre.eu/publications/the-european-proposal-for-a-digital-markets-act-a-first-assessment/
Geradin, D. (2018), ‘What Should EU Competition Policy Do to Address the Concerns Raised by the Digital Platforms’ Market Power?’ TILEC Discussion Paper, No. 2018-041, Available at 22 May 2021. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3299910
Lübbig, T. J., Aitken, S. Jensen, and J. Goyder (2020), ‘The EU’s (Proposed) New Competition Tool - a Paradigm Shift Towards More Intervention in Digital Markets and Possibly Beyond’, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer blog. Available at 20 July 2021. https://technologyquotient.freshfields.com/post/102g8y2/the-eus-proposed-new-competition-tool-a-paradigm-shift-towards-more-interven
Michelle Cini @ Patryk Czulno (2022) Digital Single Market and the EU Competition Regime: An Explanation of Policy Change. Journal of European integration VOL. 44, № 1, 41–57.
Anderson, J., and M. Mariniello (2021) ‘Regulating Big Tech: The Digital Markets Act’. Blog post. Bruegel.org, 16 February. Available at 2 April 2021. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/2021/02/regulating- big-tech-the-digital-markets-act/
Розпорядження КМ України від 17.01.2018 р. № 67-р «Про схвалення Концепції розвитку цифрової економіки та суспільства України на 2018-2020 роки та затвердження плану заходів щодо її реалізації». Офіційний вісник України від 23.02.2018-2018 р., № 16, с. 70, стаття 560, код акту 89147/2018.
Кульчицький І. Програми та інструменти підтримки розвитку інновацій в Україні (аналітичний огляд). - Львів-Київ-2020. Українська національна платформа Форуму громадянського суспільства Східного партнерства. URL: http://eap-csf.org.ua/
Lepa R.M., Madykh A.A. (2011) Perspektyvy vykorystannia refleksyvnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi [Prospects for the use of a reflexive approach in economics]. ECONOMICS: time realities. 1(1). 17-20.
Simon J. Cognitive Limits on Rationality / J. Simon, H. March. – New York: McGrow-Hill, 1958. 270 p.;
Dymchenko N.S. (2013) Refleksyvne upravlinnia ta yoho rol v upravlinskii diialnosti [Reflective management and its role in managerial activity]. “Ekonomika ta menedzhment”: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Lutsk. Lutskyi natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet. Vol.10 (38). Pp. 55-66.
Kalinesku T.V. (2013) Zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv z vykorystanniam refleksyvnoho pidkhodu [Ensuring the sustainable development of industrial enterprises using a reflexive approach]. Innovatsiina ekonomika, Vol. 1 (39). Pp. 73-77.
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W W Norton & Co.
Umanets T.V., Shlafman N.L., Danylina S.O. ta in. (2022) Adaptatsiia upravlinnia biznes-protsesamy v umovakh tsyfrovizatsii ekonomiky: teoretychnyi aspekt [Adaptation of business process management in conditions of digitalization of the economy: theoretical aspect]. Odesa: DU IREED NANU, 380 p.
Kucherenko V.R., Butenko A.I.(eds.) (2004) Ekonomika i planuvannia biznesu. Naukove vydannia, Odesa: 458 p.
Tsiavos, Vasilis & Kitsios, Fotis. (2022). Technology as Driver, Enabler and Barrier of Digital Transformation: A Review.
Chen, P.; Yan, Z.; Wang, P. (2023) How can the Digital Economy Boost the Performance of Entrepreneurs? A Large Sample of Evidence from China’s Business Incubators. Sustainability. 15, 5789.
Aulia, Zahara & Meinasya, Aulia. (2022). Analysis of E-Commerce Utilization in MSME (Micro Small and Medium Enterprises). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365172361_Analysis_of_ECommerce_Utilization_in_MSME_Micro_Small_and_Medium_Enterprises; Olapade, Susan & Lin, Zhi & Qin, Yupei & Xue, Yuan & Ni, Chenkai. (2023). E-Commerce in the Post-Pandemic Era: The Role of Innovative Technology.
Peter, Marc & Baumgartner, Reto & Lindeque, Johan & Rozumowski, Anna & Siscaro, Danilo & Binnendijk, Valentin & Gasser, Marc. (2023). E-Commerce Automation Report 2023: Einleitung, Studienresultate und Workshop-Canvas E-Commerce Automation.
Ištvanić, Marin & Milić, Dominika & Krpic, Zdravko. (2017). Digital Marketing in the Business Environment. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems. 8. 67-75.
Santos Jaen, Jose Manuel & Gimeno-Arias, Fernando & León-Gómez, Ana & Palacios Manzano, Mercedes. (2023). The Business Digitalization Process in SMEs from the Implementation of e-Commerce: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research. 18. 1700-1720.
Mukesh, H.V. (2022). Digital Transformation Taking Centre Stage: How Is Digital Transformation Reshaping Entrepreneurial Innovation?. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 31.
Wang, Shuai & Ahmad, Fayyaz & Li, Yanlong & Abid, Nabila & Chandio, Abbas & Rehman, Abdul. (2022). The Impact of Industrial Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability. 14. 4520.
Shlafman, N., Bondarenko, O., & Zakcharov, O. (2020). Modern theoretical foundations of formation of the market of innovative technologies in the context of the concept of neoindustrialization. Economic Innovations, 22(1(74), 165-178.
Online Platforms: How to Adapt Regulatory Framework to the Digital Age? Policy Department A: Economy and Scientific Policy European Parliament PE 607.323. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/607323/IPOL_BRI(2017)607323_EN.pdf
De Streel, A., B. Liebhaberg, A. Fletcher, R. Feasey, J. Krämer, and G. Monti (2021) ‘The European Proposal for A Digital Markets Act: A First Assessment’. Centre on Regulation in Europe, 19 January. Available at 15 July 2021. URL: https://cerre.eu/publications/the-european-proposal-for-a-digital-markets-act-a-first-assessment/
Geradin, D. (2018), ‘What Should EU Competition Policy Do to Address the Concerns Raised by the Digital Platforms’ Market Power?’ TILEC Discussion Paper, No. 2018-041, Available at 22 May 2021. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3299910
Lübbig, T. J., Aitken, S. Jensen, and J. Goyder (2020), ‘The EU’s (Proposed) New Competition Tool - a Paradigm Shift Towards More Intervention in Digital Markets and Possibly Beyond’, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer blog. Available at 20 July 2021.
Michelle Cini @ Patryk Czulno (2022) Digital Single Market and the EU Competition Regime: An Explanation of Policy Change. Journal of European integration VOL. 44, № 1, 41–57.
Anderson, J., and M. Mariniello (2021) ‘Regulating Big Tech: The Digital Markets Act’. Blog post. Bruegel.org, 16 February. Available at 2 April 2021. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/2021/02/regulating- big-tech-the-digital-markets-act/
Rozporiadzhennia KM Ukrainy vid 17.01.2018 r. № 67-r «Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky ta suspilstva Ukrainy na 2018-2020 roky ta zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv shchodo yii realizatsii». Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy vid 23.02.2018-2018 r., № 16, s. 70, stattia 560, kod akta 89147/2018.
Kulchytskyi I. (2020) Prohramy ta instrumenty pidtrymky rozvytku innovatsii v Ukraini (analitychnyi ohliad) [Programs and tools to support the development of innovations in Ukraine (analytical review)]. Lviv-Kyiv, URL: http://eap-csf.org.ua/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
