BEHAVIORAL TOOLS FOR INCREASING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE WORKFORCE IN THE LABOR MARKET
Abstract
The article offers a set of tools of state influence on increasing the competitiveness of the workforce in the labor market, systematized according to the following directions: political-legal, demographic, social, resource, market-industry, financial-economic, technical-technological, managerial and behavioral. The proposed tools reflect various aspects of state influence on increasing the competitiveness of the workforce in the labor market and can be used in combination to achieve better results, as well as to create a comprehensive strategy for increasing the competitiveness of the workforce in the labor market. Depending on specific conditions and needs, you can choose those tools that will most effectively contribute to the achievement of the set goals. Behavioral tools for increasing the competitiveness of the workforce in the labor market are singled out, divided into the following groups: progressive, modifying, regulatory, correlative, stabilizing, and adaptive. Progressive tools aim to create new, innovative workforce behaviors, while modification tools change existing behaviors. Regulatory tools establish rules and norms of behavior, and correlative tools form models that take into account changes in the economy. Stabilizing tools support the stability of behavior, and adaptive tools facilitate the adaptation of the workforce to changes in the labor market. These tools are used to encourage the workforce to become more competitive by adjusting, adapting and adapting to changes in the labor market. Behavioral tools are proven to adjust and improve workforce behavior to achieve better results. The use of such tools will contribute to the formation, development and reproduction of the workforce, which will positively affect the economic development of the country and increase its competitiveness. It was concluded that the state policy of increasing the competitiveness of the workforce in the labor market should include the entire range of methods and tools used by state authorities at various levels to achieve the state of effective employment and ensure the effective functioning of the labor market.
References
Лісогор Л.С., Руденко Н.В., Чувардинський В.О. Конкурентоспроможність робочої сили: проблеми формування та реалізації в умовах інноваційних змін на ринку праці. Економіка i організація управління. 2018. № 3 (31). С. 24–36.
Семикіна М.В., Голбанос С.С. Конкурентоспроможність молоді на ринку праці в умовах системної кризи. Наукові праці Кіровоградського національного технічного університету. Економічні науки. 2015. Вип. 27. С. 28–35.
Шаульська Л.В., Якимова Н.С. Напрями підвищення конкурентоспроможності молоді в контексті забезпечення ефективності державної соціальної політики. Вісник Донецького національного університету економіки і торгівлі ім. Михайла Туган-Барановського. Серія: Економічні науки. 2018. № 1. С. 119–127.
Безгін К.С., Ушкальов В.В. Поведінкова економіка: епістемічний поворот у трактуванні раціональності. Економіка України. 2019. № 7-8 (692-693). С. 3–15.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business. 1986. Vol. 59, № 4. Part 2. P. 251–278.
Якимова Н.С., Панченко І.В. Концептуальні засади державної політики регулювання поведінкових моделей суб’єктів ринку праці. Економіка та суспільство. 2020. Вип. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2020-22-55
Lisohor L.S., Rudenko N.V., Chuvardynskyi V.O. (2018) Konkurentospromozhnist robochoi syly: problemy formuvannia ta realizatsii v umovakh innovatsiinykh zmin na rynku pratsi [Labor competitiveness: problems of formation and implementation in the conditions of innovative changes in the labor market]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, vol. 3 (31), рр. 24–36. (in Ukrainian)
Semykina M.V., Holbanos S.S. (2015) Konkurentospromozhnist molodi na rynku pratsi v umovakh systemnoi kryzy [Competitiveness of youth in the labor market in conditions of systemic crisis]. Naukovi pratsi Kirovohradskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 27, рр. 28–35. (in Ukrainian)
Shaulska L.V., Yakymova N.S. (2018) Napriamy pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti molodi v konteksti zabezpechennia efektyvnosti derzhavnoi sotsialnoi polityky [Directions for increasing the competitiveness of youth in the context of ensuring the effectiveness of state social policy]. Visnyk Donetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli im. Mykhaila Tuhan-Baranovskoho. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 1, рр. 119–127. (in Ukrainian)
Bezghin K.S., Ushkalov V.V. (2019) Povedinkova ekonomika: epistemichnyi povorot u traktuvanni ratsionalnosti [Behavioral economics: an epistemic turn in the interpretation of rationality]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, vol. 7–8 (692-693), рр. 3–15. (in Ukrainian)
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986) Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, vol. 59, no. 4, part 2, pp. 251–278.
Yakymova N.S., Panchenko I.V. (2020) Kontseptualni zasady derzhavnoi polityky rehuliuvannia povedinkovykh modelei subiektiv rynku pratsi [Conceptual principles of the state policy of regulation of behavioral models of labor market subjects]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, vol. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2020-22-55 (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
