CONCEPTUAL ESSENCE OF THE LINK BETWEEN ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR OF HOUSEHOLDS AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of causality of the economic behaviour of households and development of territories, the causal relationship of which is determined by the needs, interests, motives, incentives and forms of economic decision-making by households. It was found that the effective financial system of the country has a positive effect on economic development and growth of national welfare, and the state and prospects of financial sources of households are a priority for the functioning of the economic system of the region or the country as a whole. It has been proven that household finances occupy a special place among the resources of the national financial market, which characterizes not only the standard of living associated with consumption, income and expenditure of households, but also represents an important investment resource in economic development. It is substantiated that the state financial policy has a significant impact on the well-being of communities by regulating the banking sector, ensuring social insurance payments and financial services, social policy in education, employment, pensions and financial investment programs. Theoretical approaches to the explanation of economic behaviour are generalized and the determinants of its formation for households are offered, the factors of influence on the economic behaviour of households are offered. The question of the structural impact of financial deprivation as a state of the household or community, for which there are no basic social needs, on the economic growth of the regions is considered. The definition of socio-economic deprivation is defined as the absence of social and economic benefits that are considered necessary for society, community or region. It has been proven that communities with high demand and low levels of basic needs often show low social and economic status compared to other neighbouring communities.
References
Arano K., Parker C., Terry R. Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 48(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00201.x
Весker G. The Economic Way of Looking at Life. Nobel Lecture, December. URL: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1509&context=law_and_economics
Brown S., Ghosh P., Taylor K. Household finances and social interaction: Bayesian analysis of household panel data. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(3), 2016, 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12174
Campbell J. Y. (2006). Household finance. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 2006, 1553-1604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x
Curtis C., Lugauer S., Mark N. Demographics and aggregate household saving in Japan, China and India. Journal of Macroeconomics, 51, 2017, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.01.002
Dierkes M., Klos A., Langer T. (2011). A note on representativeness and household finance. Economics Letters, 113(1), 2011, 62-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.045
Dominitz J., Manski C. Using Expectations Data To Study SubjectiveIncome Expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 92(439), 1997, 855-867.
Gao M., Fok R. Demographics, family/social interaction, and household finance. Economics Letters, 136, 2015, 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.09.027
Glaeser E., Laibson D., Sacerdote B. The Economic Approach to Social Capital. Economic Journal, 112 (483), 2002, 437-458.
Gogolin F., Dowling M., Cummins M. Individual values and household finances. Applied Economics, 49(35), 2017, 3560-3578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1262528
Hong H., Kubik J., Stein J. Social interaction and stock market participation. The Journal of Finance, 59(1), 2004, 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00629.x
Liang P. H., Guo S. Q. Social interaction, internet access and stock market participation – An empirical study in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4), 2015, 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.003
Renneboog B., Spaenjers, C. Religion, economic attitudes, and household finance. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), 2012, 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr025
Stango V., Zinman J. Exponential growth bias and household finance. The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2009, 2807-2849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01518.x
Біль М.М., Мульска О.П. Добробут як домінанта економічного зростання: концептуально-методичний базис. Modern Economics, 23, 2020, 6-12. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V23(2020)-01.
Біль М.М., Мульска О.П. Економічна поведінка домогосподарств та їх добробут: моделі і форми взаємовпливу. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України: зб. наук. пр. 2020. Вип. 5 (145). 3-8. https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2020-5-1.
Галушка З.І. Соціалізація трансформаційної економіки: особливості, проблеми, пріоритети: монографія. Чернівецький національний університет, 2009.
Іванов Р. В. Теоретико-методологічні основи моделювання економічної поведінки домогосподарств. (Автореф. дис. д-ра екон. Наук). Запоріжжя.
Катаранчук Г. Г. Поведінка домашніх господарств як суб’єктів ринкових відносин. (Дис. канд. екон. наук). Київ.
Шкварчук Л. О. Сучасні тенденції споживчої поведінки населення. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка», 833, 2015, 124-130.
Arano, K., Parker, C., & Terry, R. (2010). Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00201.x
Весker G. The Economic Way of Looking at Life. Nobel Lecture, December. URL: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1509&context=law_and_economics
Brown, S., Ghosh, P., & Taylor, K. (2016). Household finances and social interaction: Bayesian analysis of household panel data. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(3), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12174
Campbell, J. Y. (2006). Household finance. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1553-1604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00883.x
Curtis, C. C., Lugauer, S., & Mark, N. C. (2017). Demographics and aggregate household saving in Japan, China and India. Journal of Macroeconomics, 51, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.01.002
Dierkes, M., Klos, A., & Langer, T. (2011). A note on representativeness and household finance. Economics Letters, 113(1), 62-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.045
Dominitz, J. & Manski C. (1997). Using Expectations Data To Study SubjectiveIncome Expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 92(439), 855-867.
Gao, M., & Fok, R. (2015). Demographics, family/social interaction, and household finance. Economics Letters, 136, 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.09.027
Glaeser E., Laibson D., & Sacerdote B. (2002). The Economic Approach to Social Capital. Economic Journal, 112 (483), 437-458.
Gogolin, F., Dowling, M., & Cummins, M. (2017). Individual values and household finances. Applied Economics, 49(35), 3560-3578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1262528
Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Stein, J. C. (2004). Social interaction and stock market participation. The Journal of Finance, 59(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00629.x
Liang, P. H., & Guo, S. Q. (2015). Social interaction, internet access and stock market participation – An empirical study in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4), 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.003
Renneboog, B. L., & Spaenjers, C. (2012). Religion, economic attitudes, and household finance. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr025
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2009). Exponential growth bias and household finance. The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2807-2849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01518.x
Bil M., Mulska O. (2020). Dobrobut yak dominanta ekonomichnoho zrostannya: kontseptualʹno-metodychnyy bazys [Welfare as a dominant economic growth: the conceptual and methodological basis]. Modern Economics, 23, 6-12. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V23(2020)-01. (in Ukrainian)
Bil M., Mulska O. (2020). Ekonomichna povedinka domohospodarstv ta yikh dobrobut: modeli i formy vzayemovplyvu [Economic behavior of households and their welfare: models and forms of interaction]. Sotsialʹno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny – Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine, 5 (145), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2020-5-1. (in Ukrainian)
Galushka ZI Sotsializatsiya transformatsiynoyi ekonomiky: osoblyvosti, problemy, priorytety [Socialization of transformational economy: features, problems, priorities]. Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National University, 2009. (in Ukrainian)
Ivanov R.V. (2019). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy modelyuvannya ekonomichnoyi povedinky domohospodarstv [Theoretical and methodological foundations of modeling the economic behavior of households]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Zaporizhzhia. (in Ukrainian)
Kataranchuk, G.G. (2017). Povedinka domashnikh hospodarstv yak sub’yektiv rynkovykh vidnosyn [Behavior of households as subjects of market relations]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)
Shkvarchuk, L.O. (2015). Suchasni tendentsiyi spozhyvchoyi povedinky naselennya [Modern trends in consumer behavior]. Visnyk Natsional’noho universytetu «Lvivs’ka politekhnika» – Bulletin of the National University ‘Lviv Polytechnic’, 833, 124-130. (in Ukrainian)
