PANDEMIC CHANGES IN INSTITUTIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY

Keywords: COVID-19, institutional forms, corporate social responsibility, pandemic, enterprise, entrepreneurial activity, social responsibility

Abstract

In connection with the changes that have occurred in the world as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the peculiarities of the implementation of social responsibility have also arisen. Social responsibility can be an important part of global recovery. The purpose of the article is to determine the features of the application of social responsibility technologies in the context of the implementation of modern entrepreneurship in the context of the global coronavirus crisis and, on this basis, to develop a concept for changing the institutional forms of social responsibility in entrepreneurial activity. The article analyzes the current state of corporate social responsibility in the world, in terms of economic and social processes associated with the global pandemic caused by COVID-19. The differences in the implementation of corporate social responsibility technologies in the current conditions of doing business are shown, the prospects for further development of corporate social responsibility are determined. The dependence of awareness on the company's social initiatives with the purchase decision is highlighted, which is an important factor in overcoming the company's crisis. The advantages of using corporate social responsibility technologies in a state of crisis are highlighted. CSR is an important tool that can allow a company to emerge from a crisis. In today's world, society is paying more and more attention to the social component of the company. This applies to both the company's customers and actual and potential employees of the company and other stakeholders. The intentions and goals of the company in the social context become not only desirable, but also mandatory. All the phenomena caused by the Covid-19 pandemic are now being felt to a greater extent in America and Europe, but it is becoming clear that Ukraine will soon also face all the challenges of today. Therefore, it is very important to draw the attention of leaders of domestic companies to such trends as inclusion, inadmissibility of any discrimination, comprehensive support for employees, the introduction of CSR technologies in everyday activities.

References

Moore K. Corporate Social Responsibility: Consumers Will Remember Companies That Led In 2020. Forbes. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2020/07/31/corporate-social-responsibility-consumers-will-remember-companies-that-led-in2020/?sh= 359650 88eb65 (дата звернення: 31.07.2020).

Kramer M. Coronavirus Is Putting Corporate Social Responsibility to the Test. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/2020/04/coronavirus-is-putting-corporate-social-responsibility-to-the-test (дата звернення: 30.04.2020).

The trends to know in 2019. GlobalWebIndex. URL: https://www.gwi.com/reports/trends-19?hsCtaTracking=62ea46df-2ace-4b22-ad53-6e13786a3ad0%7Ca3696ef8-0c16-4eae-9dad-b3a88e9a7f8d (дата звернення: 20.01.2020).

Manimalar R., Sudha S. Corporate ethical and legal responsibility: effects of CSR on consumer trust and brand loyalty. Indian Journal of Management. 2016. № 9(6). Р. 7.

Sharma, R., Jain V. CSR, trust, brand loyalty and brand equity: empirical evidences from sportswear industry in the NCR region of India. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research. 2019. № 18(1), Р. 57–67.

Han H., Yu, J., Kim W. Environmental corporate social responsibility and the strategy to boost the airline’s image and customer loyalty intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2019. № 36(3). Р. 371–383.

Zhang, Q., Ahmad, S. Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Execution Effects on Purchase Intention with the Moderating Role of Customer Awareness. Sustainability. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084548 (дата звернення: 13.03.2021).

Abdeen A., Rajah E., Gaur S. Consumers’ beliefs about firm’s CSR initiatives and their purchase behaviour. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2016. № 34. Р. 2–18.

Amoroso D., Roman, F. Corporate social responsibility and purchase intention: The roles of loyalty, advocacy and quality of life in the Philippines. Int. J. Manag. 2015. № 4. Р. 25–41.

Mulaessa N., Wang H. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on consumers purchase intention in China: Mediating role of consumer support for responsible business. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2017. № 9. Р. 73–81.

Clark S. What Corporate Social Responsibility Looks Like in 2020. URL: https://www.reworked.co/leadership/what-corporate-social-responsibility-looks-like-in-2020/ (дата звернення: 08.06.2020).

Battilana J., Casciaro T. Power Sharing Can Change Corporations for the Better Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/2021/05/power-sharing-can-change-corporations-for-the-better (дата звернення: 13.05.2021).

Саприкіна М. У компаній з’являється голос. Найголовніші КСВ тренди у 2021 році. Delo.ua. URL: https://delo.ua/business/jakimi-budut-trendi-korporativnoji-socialnoji-vi-381723/ (дата звернення: 3.05.2021).

Ventura L. ESG. Reporting Fails The Transparency Test. Global Finance. URL: https://www.gfmag.com/magazine/april-2021/esg-reporting-fails-transparency-test (дата звернення: 6.04.2021).

Colombo L. Corporate Social Responsibility Is Not Only Ethical, But Also A Modern Business Tool. Forbes. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2021/04/05/corporate-social-responsibility-is-not-only-ethical-but-also-a-modern-business-tool/?sh=ccf0ebc1bfa5 (дата звернення: 05.04.2021).

Moore K. Corporate Social Responsibility: Consumers Will Remember Companies That Led In 2020. Forbes. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2020/07/31/corporate-social-responsibility-consumers-will-remember-companies-that-led-in 2020/?sh=359650 88eb65 (accessed 31 July 2020).

Kramer M. Coronavirus Is Putting Corporate Social Responsibility to the Test. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/2020/04/coronavirus-is-putting-corporate-social-responsibility-to-the-test (accessed 30 April 2020).

The trends to know in 2019. GlobalWebIndex. URL: https://www.gwi.com/reports/trends-19?hsCtaTracking=62ea46df-2ace-4b22-ad53-6e13786a3ad0%7Ca3696ef8-0c16-4eae-9dad-b3a88e9a7f8d (accessed 20 January 2020).

Manimalar R., Sudha S. Corporate ethical and legal responsibility: effects of CSR on consumer trust and brand loyalty. Indian Journal of Management. 2016. № 9(6). Р. 7.

Sharma, R., Jain V. CSR, trust, brand loyalty and brand equity: empirical evidences from sportswear industry in the NCR region of India. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research. 2019. № 18(1), Р. 57–67.

Han H., Yu, J., Kim W. Environmental corporate social responsibility and the strategy to boost the airline’s image and customer loyalty intentions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2019. № 36(3). Р. 371–383.

Zhang, Q., Ahmad, S. Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Execution Effects on Purchase Intention with the Moderating Role of Customer Awareness. Sustainability. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084548 (accessed 13 March 2021).

Abdeen A., Rajah E., Gaur S. Consumers’ beliefs about firm’s CSR initiatives and their purchase behaviour. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2016. № 34. Р. 2–18.

Amoroso D., Roman, F. Corporate social responsibility and purchase intention: The roles of loyalty, advocacy and quality of life in the Philippines. Int. J. Manag. 2015. № 4. Р. 25–41.

Mulaessa N., Wang H. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on consumers purchase intention in China: Mediating role of consumer support for responsible business. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2017. № 9. Р. 73–81.

Clark S. What Corporate Social Responsibility Looks Like in 2020. URL: https://www.reworked.co/leadership/what-corporate-social-responsibility-looks-like-in-2020/ (accessed 8 June 2020).

Battilana J., Casciaro T. Power Sharing Can Change Corporations for the Better. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/2021/05/power-sharing-can-change-corporations-for-the-better (accessed 13 May 2021).

Saprykina M. U kompanii ziavliaietsia holos. Naiholovnishi KSV trendy u 2021 rotsi [The main CSR trends in 2021]. Delo.ua. URL: https://delo.ua/business/jakimi-budut-trendi-korporativnoji-socialnoji-vi-381723/ (accessed 3 May 2021) (in Ukrainian)

Ventura L. ESG. Reporting Fails The Transparency Test. Global Finance. URL: https://www.gfmag.com/magazine/april-2021/esg-reporting-fails-transparency-test (accessed 6 April 2021).

Colombo L. Corporate Social Responsibility Is Not Only Ethical, But Also A Modern Business Tool. Forbes. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2021/04/05/corporate-social-responsibility-is-not-only-ethical-but-also-a-modern-business-tool/?sh=ccf0ebc1bfa5 (accessed 5 April 2021).

Article views: 141
PDF Downloads: 218
Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Yevtushenko, V. (2021). PANDEMIC CHANGES IN INSTITUTIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY. Economy and Society, (28). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-28-49
Section
ENTREPRENEURSHIP, TRADE AND STOCK EXCHANGE ACTIVITY

Most read articles by the same author(s)